View Full Version : Dave's Evo X Build/The Life of Dave blog
Murlo26
02-01-2013, 05:35 PM
You can get a 6266 or 6766 for half the cost of a 6466, so it's probably not going to be that commonly used.
Really?
The 6466 is actually more than both those by double? Or do you mean a lot of people are selling them used for cheap or something? Just confused how the other turbos can be so much cheaper? I am guessing they are all about the same cost to produce.
4seasons69
02-01-2013, 05:40 PM
Really?
The 6466 is actually more than both those by double? Or do you mean a lot of people are selling them used for cheap or something? Just confused how the other turbos can be so much cheaper? I am guessing they are all about the same cost to produce.
on pte's website a 6466 is 1909.99, a 6766 is 1199.99 and a 6266 is 999.99 so the 6466 is just normally quite a bit more
scheides
02-01-2013, 07:52 PM
That is awesome, I say do it.
Is there anyone local making good power on a 6466? I haven't seen one outpower a 6266.
There's a guy named Troy on evomn (and here) that had a 6266 fail, when it came back it was a 6466. The car made like 40whp more and spooled about 200rpm later. Pretty sweet :)
evotuner
02-01-2013, 08:53 PM
i like the 6466 idea lol
although your ef4 is probably pretty nasty
turbotalon1g
02-01-2013, 08:57 PM
There's a guy named Troy on evomn (and here) that had a 6266 fail, when it came back it was a 6466. The car made like 40whp more and spooled about 200rpm later. Pretty sweet :)
Same boost levels?
Halon
02-01-2013, 09:00 PM
There's a guy...that had a 6266 fail
That's wierd...
goodhart
02-01-2013, 11:25 PM
That's wierd...
2 of them actually. One lasted about 5 minutes of idling, the other about 500 miles of break in and >10 psi.
http://www.evomn.net/forums/showthread.php?7911-6266-vs-6466-comparison
MorningWood
02-02-2013, 10:54 AM
Me and Josh are both making good power on the 6466's. My car still had a stock intake manifold, throttle body, and no porting on the head, it made 709whp at 38psi on RS's Mustang Dyno. Josh Made over 700 on Buschur's Mustang Dyno.
The reason the 6466's cost so much more is they only come in Ball Bearing, you can get the 62 and 67 in Journal Bearings hence the lower price on the site, when you get up to the Ball Bearing option for those turbo's they close in on price with the 64.
My 64 actually spooled the same as my 62 did, at 35psi it didnt really make much more power. but the 6266 quit making power on my set up at that level (615whp on Ron's Dyno) the 6466 started picking up good power around there so it must have been right in its efficiency range, I ended up being able to make 665whp with 39psi, then it slowed down on making power until I went from kelford 272's to GSC s3's where it made 709whp at 38psi
bramagedained
02-02-2013, 12:03 PM
My car is at DB getting the fuel system changed some and setup on E98 so we'll see what kind of power it will make all in. Though my stock ported TB and IM will probably turn into a restriction, maybe the M2 cams too, but, none of that is going to get changed.
The 711 at buschur/773 at MAP my car made was done with a tune setup for E70(that was 5 months old at the tme) too.
turbotalon1g
02-02-2013, 01:13 PM
Vassil made 745 on a DSM at DB at 35psi, that is why I ask and there are a few DSMs in that 700-750 range without going over 40psi.
That is the only reason I say that, I have heard that the 6466 and 6766 spool damn near the 6266 in a lot of cases though.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.