Log in

View Full Version : Project Lex


Pages : 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178

Halon
09-28-2010, 11:31 PM
I've been trying to decide which tuning method to go, and have recently been talking a lot with a guy over on the lexus forums about a megasquirt system that he builds and runs on his car, and on a few others in his neck of the woods.

Anyone here have any first hand experience with any of the NEWER MS stuff? I know there's a lot of bad thoughts regarding the original MS, but I've heard some positive stuff regarding the newer versions.

Couple of the cons are that it's less widely used, so there might be less support for it, less people willing to tune it, less people capable of tuning it to it's full capability due to less on-hands experience with it. Not Plug-n-Play so harness modifications may be required unless I can find any kind of pigtail to go inbetween the two. Batch injection, this is a grey subject for me. I heard that because of this, it may have to idle a little rich, but I am no expert at that at all. Is batch injection going to really kill drivability, or is it workable? When setting up AEM systems, do people always pretty much use sequential?

Some pro's are it's about 1/3 of the cost of AEM. Don't need an external MAP sensor as it has one built in so you just run a vacuum line straight to the box. Would be wired in parallel with the ECU, not so that it acts as a piggyback, but rather acts in parallel with the ECU so that the ECU can still control A/C and stuff like that, while the MS box fully controls fuel, timing, 2-step, NLTS, knock, etc... The new TunerStudio software is supposedly pretty user friendly (from what I've read, no 1st hand experience here).

So I'm currently a little torn. If anyone has some first hand experience, or some useful input into AEM vs. MS, feel free to voice your thoughts as I'm still a ways out from ordering anything, and am all ears at this point as I'm just trying to gather as many facts and opinions for now to help me make a better educated decision when the time does come.

The guy who I've been speaking with, here's a clip of his SC300 running his MS setup (user name Shaodome over on club lexus, seems to be a bright guy):
http://www.youtube.com/shaodome

Some TunerStudio info:
http://www.efianalytics.com/TunerStudio/

FattyBoomBatty
09-29-2010, 07:17 AM
My car made less boost/horsepower at MAP last june and I hadn't changed anything from the previous month when I was at DB.

turbotalon1g
09-29-2010, 08:44 AM
^hahaha.

I'd say talk to the guy who will be tuning your car.
I don't mind MS, but I've only seen the older stuff I think its a good product if you don't have any other choices, maybe a used AEM?

At-Least-It's-An-Evo
09-29-2010, 08:51 AM
^hahaha.

I'd say talk to the guy who will be tuning your car.
I don't mind MS, but I've only seen the older stuff I think its a good product if you don't have any other choices, maybe a used AEM?

Used AEM's are still $1100-1300 from the supra/lexus guys.

Halon
09-29-2010, 09:05 AM
The MS system from this guy is basically $750, and the TunerStudio software is free. Also no need to buy a MAP sensor as it has one in it from what he's said, so 1 less sensor to purchase.

My 2 biggest concerns at this point I think are:
1) having to actually splice into the harness
2) batch injector firing (again not sure if this is actually a huge deal, which is why i'm asking).


If I can find a way to be more comfortable with those 2 items, I may just go MS unless I am convinced otherwise.

FattyBoomBatty
09-29-2010, 05:54 PM
The fun of megasquirt is building it yourself, tuning it yourself and running it lean till it blows up. If you were ice racing this sc300, I would say totally do it. Now that you're ballin' with a toyota product, I'd get a motec ecu or something spendy like that. Megasquirt tech support is virtually non existant, so there's a huge learning curve. I built one once, and it connected to the computer and everything, but I never got it running on a car. I "tuned" a friend's MS setup to get the AFR's to a good enough spot.

Cliff notes: Easy, but dumb.

Halon
09-29-2010, 08:23 PM
The flip side of this is, I will not be building it. It is a build that another SC300-er has built and installed on a bunch of SC's, and has apparently got it running pretty well. I'd be buying it from him, and as such he would be the tech support. So it wouldn't be jumping in blindly, building something from scratch. There's actually working systems (working well according to him) already out there on these, which is why I'm even considering it.

Motec, umm... I'm pretty sure that will cost about the same as I paid for this car, so no. It's not some ballin car, it's an 18 year old lexus with 150k on it :D haha. I'm still a DSMer at heart, so $750 MS vs. $2000 AEM v2 is enough of a difference to make me take a step back and think.

Super Bleeder!!
09-29-2010, 10:37 PM
i vote used AEM

Shane@DBPerformance
09-30-2010, 10:42 AM
Hondata!

Halon
09-30-2010, 11:26 AM
Did some basic maintenance crap to it. Replaced burnt out bulbs, check oil and coolant and they both look brand new. Replaced the cracked LCD screen, and the back lighting light bulbs (I'll put up some random pics of that repair later).

I have a little to-do list yet at home, but basic maintenance crap will continue over the rest of the fall, so it's ready for some "fun" work this winter.