PDA

View Full Version : GheyrodX - bigger, fatter, gheyer!

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 [76] 77 78 79 80 81 82 83
Kracka
12-21-2012, 09:33 AM
Standard cover testing begins today. GheyrodX had a sleepover last night with some foxy Subaru bitches ;)
Murlo26
12-21-2012, 09:51 AM
Standard cover testing begins today. GheyrodX had a sleepover last night with some foxy Subaru bitches ;)

I approve of your description of Subaru's as bitches :)

Good luck.
Tachyon
12-21-2012, 11:37 AM
Standard cover testing begins today. GheyrodX had a sleepover last night with some foxy Subaru bitches ;)

Nice! Looking forward to seeing this next week.
Kracka
12-22-2012, 04:51 PM
Here are my latest results, these are with the standard 3" compressor cover rather than the 3" anti-surge cover. This seems to be the winning setup if you ask me; 200 RPM quicker spool, better response, more torque, nearly identical horsepower, and of course one less option to pay for :)

http://www.dsmstyle.com/photopost/data/641/MAP_EF2_5_std.jpg

Driving impressions are great! No surge issues could be felt and it drove very nicely. Initial impressions are it drives just as smooth as the anti-surge version, but give me another few days to truly experience the turbo in more scenarios. Oddly enough, turbo intake noise is slightly more with the standard cover than with the anti-surge version.

My final verdict: Standard cover is the way to order this turbo. Save yourself a few bucks and enjoy the quicker spool/response times!
scheides
12-22-2012, 07:15 PM
Badass! I was second-guessing this wheel combo but it looks pretty pimp now!
Mark Leasure
12-22-2012, 07:15 PM
Looks like good results with the std cover. Nice power on 93 too.
goodhart
12-23-2012, 12:38 AM
More power under almost the entire curve too! Nice!

It would be nice to see an over lay of the standard cover EF2.5 vs the EF2 once they get the database updated.
Kracka
12-23-2012, 07:57 AM
Should be available next week.
goodhart
12-29-2012, 11:02 AM
EF2 vs EF 2.5 standard cover:
http://accessecu.com/dyno/graph.php?gb=0&hp=1&torque=1&rpm=1&sl=1&sln=1&sat=0&cb=0&dgr=1&smm=0&sg=1&runid1=4008&rgb1=000000255&runid2=4186&rgb2=204000000

Not sure which I like better, the extra low end grunt of the EF2 or the higher peak and top end of the EF2.5.

http://accessecu.com/dyno/graph.php?gb=0&hp=1&boost=1&rpm=1&sl=1&sln=1&sat=0&cb=0&dgr=1&smm=0&sg=1&runid1=4008&rgb1=000000255&runid2=4152&rgb2=204000000&runid3=4186&rgb3=000153000
Murlo26
12-29-2012, 11:27 AM
I'd still take the 2. On a more basic setup, aka no porting, I might go for the 2.5 but his setup is efficient so 2 all the way