05-17-2011
|
#1
|
Rainbow Boy
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Richfield, MN
Drives: 96 Civic HX
Posts: 908
|
Quite interesting Top 50 drivers cars!
|
|
|
05-17-2011
|
#2
|
Tournaments Won: 3
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Maple Grove, MN
Drives: Lancer and Durango
Posts: 7,017
|
Re: Quite interesting Top 50 drivers cars!
how the F does a miata beat a evo. In the same breath, how does an Evo beat some of those on that list i havent the slightest.
__________________
Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge. This is significantly different from the common usage of the word "theory", which implies that something is a conjecture, hypothesis, or guess.
|
|
|
05-17-2011
|
#3
|
Rainbow Boy
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Richfield, MN
Drives: 96 Civic HX
Posts: 908
|
Re: Quite interesting Top 50 drivers cars!
Have you driven a Miata Tom?
Clearly this would answer your question
-Colin
|
|
|
05-17-2011
|
#4
|
|
Re: Quite interesting Top 50 drivers cars!
There are some strange picks on that list...
|
|
|
05-17-2011
|
#5
|
R U DTF bro?
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oak Point, TX
Drives: C8 Stingray Z51
Posts: 20,620
|
Re: Quite interesting Top 50 drivers cars!
I hear driver's car - I think S2k. That list fails. Strange picks indeed.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26
I agree with Kracka.
|
|
|
|
05-17-2011
|
#6
|
Rainbow Boy
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Richfield, MN
Drives: 96 Civic HX
Posts: 908
|
Re: Quite interesting Top 50 drivers cars!
S2K has a powerband from hell...
Hell as in the bad hell, not like a bat out of hell.
Not enough low end torque to feel fun, maybe that is why? I thought they are fun to drive though...
-Colin
|
|
|
05-17-2011
|
#7
|
R U DTF bro?
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oak Point, TX
Drives: C8 Stingray Z51
Posts: 20,620
|
Re: Quite interesting Top 50 drivers cars!
The Type R and NSX made it though, NSX is also a damn fun car to drive, but the overly long 5-speed gearing made it feel sluggish. The Type R is also fun but it's still a FWD econobox at heart.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26
I agree with Kracka.
|
|
|
|
05-17-2011
|
#8
|
Reynolds number user
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: grove/tempe
Posts: 3,553
|
Re: Quite interesting Top 50 drivers cars!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kracka
The Type R and NSX made it though, NSX is also a damn fun car to drive, but the overly long 5-speed gearing made it feel sluggish. The Type R is also fun but it's still a FWD econobox at heart.
|
Its too bad we never got the NSXR here, its sposed to have waaay more aggressive ratios.
__________________
07 Ducati Monster S4R
00 honda elite 50 (64 mph braH!)
05 malaguti F15
04 E55 AMG
|
|
|
05-17-2011
|
#9
|
R U DTF bro?
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oak Point, TX
Drives: C8 Stingray Z51
Posts: 20,620
|
Re: Quite interesting Top 50 drivers cars!
After driving the NSX my two biggest complaints were gearing ratios (5-speed) and a cramped driver's footwell.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26
I agree with Kracka.
|
|
|
|
05-17-2011
|
#10
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Prior Lake
Drives: Icarus
Posts: 1,375
|
Re: Quite interesting Top 50 drivers cars!
Oh sweet, my favorite car won!
Although, I do find the list to be a little strange, myself. I'd suggest the RX-7 FD3S...
__________________
"The moment money becomes your motivation, you're immediately not as good as someone who is stimulated by passion and internal will"
-Sebastian Vettel
|
|
|
05-17-2011
|
#11
|
formerly ecoli
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On the dyno
Posts: 4,892
|
Re: Quite interesting Top 50 drivers cars!
The list doesn't seem that weird to me, I am surprised the Miata didn't place higher and that the Lotus Elise didn't place higher. The Type-R is a great track car.
|
|
|
05-17-2011
|
#12
|
Walls need hugs too
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Plymouth
Drives: V10 Touareg, Beater Jetta, Evo IX
Posts: 3,876
|
Re: Quite interesting Top 50 drivers cars!
Depends on the Miata, honestly. Between my Dad's '06 Miata and my Evo, the Evo wins on driving comfort hands down. Steering ratios are damn similar, pedal and gearbox feel are great on both, but the seats in the Miata, which has the Grand Touring package no less, are just lackluster as far as comfort goes.
I'd take the Evo for every single possible driving desire save for cruising with the top down, for obvious reasons.
Give me a gen 2 MazdaSpeed version, however, and it's game on.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26
Spaz badger don't give a shit.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trogdor
Smart chicks are better. Personally I like a girl to give me her thesis on how to solve the economic crisis while I put it in her ass.
|
|
|
|
05-17-2011
|
#13
|
*Resting In Peace*
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Heaven
Drives: 94 Plymouth Acclaim/2008 EvoX
Posts: 2,430
|
Re: Quite interesting Top 50 drivers cars!
The Lotus 2-Eleven isn't street legal (here) but I'm curious how it'd compare to the 340r. I've seen reviews where they've said it is faster than the Caterham but they like the driving dynamics of the Caterham better.
Last edited by mlomker; 05-17-2011 at 06:17 PM..
|
|
|
05-17-2011
|
#14
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MN
Drives: four tires
Posts: 1,608
|
Re: Quite interesting Top 50 drivers cars!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kracka
The Type R and NSX made it though, NSX is also a damn fun car to drive, but the overly long 5-speed gearing made it feel sluggish. The Type R is also fun but it's still a FWD econobox at heart.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Super Bleeder!!
Its too bad we never got the NSXR here, its sposed to have waaay more aggressive ratios.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kracka
After driving the NSX my two biggest complaints were gearing ratios (5-speed) and a cramped driver's footwell.
|
There are many different options to change out ratios, or swap in 6spd's. Or you can just add power, then the gearing is perfect. 
|
|
|
05-17-2011
|
#15
|
Rainbow Boy
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Richfield, MN
Drives: 96 Civic HX
Posts: 908
|
Re: Quite interesting Top 50 drivers cars!
I just get excited about things to do with miatas! especially since my build is underway!
-Colin
|
|
|
05-17-2011
|
#16
|
Smells like cat poop
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: maple grove
Drives: an evo's fat korean cousin
Posts: 2,549
|
Re: Quite interesting Top 50 drivers cars!
Quote:
Originally Posted by cudvig
I just get excited about things to do with miatas! especially since my build is underway!
-Colin
|
Haven't seen you around. Glad to see you aren't locked up.
__________________
Speaking about wanting kids...
turbotalon1g: 3 max, she wants one of each.
A////guy: "we are shooting for a transgender child this time"
|
|
|
05-17-2011
|
#17
|
aka Goodbye
|
Re: Quite interesting Top 50 drivers cars!
Yeah, Miata's are a hell of a lot of fun, for little money.
__________________
2009 Corvette Z51-SOLD
1992 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX-SOLD
2013 BMW Z4-Current summer hooptie
2017 GMC Yukon-Current winter hooptie
|
|
|
05-17-2011
|
#18
|
Rainbow Boy
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Richfield, MN
Drives: 96 Civic HX
Posts: 908
|
Re: Quite interesting Top 50 drivers cars!
I've just been busy with school and finding a job Pete!
-Colin
|
|
|
05-19-2011
|
#19
|
Shit Rocket Pilot
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Shoreview, MN
Drives: 2003 Evolution VIII
Posts: 7,752
|
Re: Quite interesting Top 50 drivers cars!
I approve of that list. There are some cars that do seem odd, but there's more to driving a car than having a billion horsepower, tires wider than a barn and electronic gadgetry that makes the space shuttle look like a science fair project.
__________________
"If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough." -Mario Andretti
03 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tachyon
Every minute you spend in your Evo, not in boost, is a minute of your life you'll never get back.
|
|
|
|
05-19-2011
|
#20
|
Tournaments Won: 3
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Maple Grove, MN
Drives: Lancer and Durango
Posts: 7,017
|
Re: Quite interesting Top 50 drivers cars!
__________________
Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge. This is significantly different from the common usage of the word "theory", which implies that something is a conjecture, hypothesis, or guess.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|