Quote:
Originally posted by Matt D.+Sep 30 2004, 05:14 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Matt D. @ Sep 30 2004, 05:14 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by JustROLLIN@Sep 30 2004, 01:12 PM
LMAO. One of the funniest thing I have read in a while.* 
|
<!--QuoteBegin-tpunx99GSX@Sep 30 2004, 02:03 PM
OWNED!!!!!* :stick:
|
If that was directed toward me, I don't get it. What does Oregon have to do with Wyotech or Mt. St. Helens? In 1980 almost the entire state of Wyoming saw at least some amount of ash. There's no saying that this pending eruption will be less or greater than the previous one. [/b][/quote]
I saw a geologist commenting on it this morning on Good Morning America as I was running late for school. He said it wasn't going to be as bad as the 1980. He could obviously be wrong though. He was talking about the gas samples starting to decline (in concentration) meaning that it should not be a huge blast like before. We will find out though.
Good luck at school.
Threaded Mode