PDA

View Full Version : Meet GheyRay: Lower, Wider, Lighter!


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 [41] 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80

Kracka
07-09-2015, 07:42 AM
Annoying as hell to be honest! I'm very glad it's off.

I never got retuned for the ported intake manifold since after the first test-drive I knew it would be coming off. Without proper retuning the ported intake manifolds show zero gains, so no, I did not feel any difference. I plan to eventually give the WeaponX ported intake manifold a shot since those are not supposed to have any adverse side effects, but he was taking too long and I wanted to have the car 100% for the cruise in two weeks.
My WeaponX Stage 1 ported intake manifold finally came in yesterday! It took so long because he was having trouble getting cores back from other customers, so he eventually just ordered a brand new one to get ported and have sent to me (which I will gladly accept, especially considering he didn't charge me a core charge). This one is quite a bit more expensive than the FasterProms whistler ($350 vs $150), but from initial impressions it is warranted (assuming it doesn't whistle as he claims). I was tempted to swap it on quick-like last night, but decided against it to just leave well enough alone for my 3k mile roadtrip that kicks off next week. I'll likely get it swapped on in early August to make sure it's retuned and ready for the annual Shreveport cruise later that month. I haven't taken any pictures yet, but the port work is definitely more in-depth, smoother, and more uniform. After now having both WeaponX's ported intake manifold and throttle body in my possession, I'd put their quality and attention to detail to be on the same level as MAP's work (I'm still bummed MAP wasn't interested in porting the intake manifold). I'll see if I can get some pictures tonight and post them tomorrow for visual comparison vs. the FasterProms.

scheides
07-09-2015, 09:17 AM
Hot giggity!!! Can't wait to see your impressions of this.

Get a f'ing big cam in this thing already! :)

Kracka
07-09-2015, 09:19 AM
Get a f'ing big cam in this thing already! :)
Hell no :) Operation stock tune and emissions compatibility is still in full effect!

The ported IM should put me somewhere around 450whp (DynoJet) if my estimation is correct.

Goat Blower
07-09-2015, 09:28 AM
That's pretty stout for mods that don't affect driveability.

Kracka
07-09-2015, 09:47 AM
That's pretty stout for mods that don't affect driveability.
I would concur, and that is exactly my plan. Zero drawbacks or reliability concerns.

Goat Blower
07-09-2015, 11:11 AM
What I wouldn't do for a rigid aluminum oil pan with a built in sealing ring ala LS versus the flimsy tin pan and RTV solution for DSM's. I spend all last night chasing down small oil leaks, meanwhile my 100K+ mile Tahoe has yet to ever shred a drop of any fluid. LS for the win!

Kracka
07-09-2015, 11:26 AM
LT FTW :)
I just hope they prove to be as durable as the LS!

turbotalon1g
07-09-2015, 12:29 PM
So you didn't order that supercharger yet?

:KANE:

Kracka
07-09-2015, 12:34 PM
So you didn't order that supercharger yet?

:KANE:
Ordered...then canceled ;)
I had to remind myself it didn't fit in my plan.

A//// Guy
07-09-2015, 12:36 PM
You have the Cruze for the plan! SC time!