MitsuStyle MitsuStyle

Go Back   MitsuStyle > Tech > Turbo / Engine / Drivetrain

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-11-2005   #3
JET
Is funding Exxon.
 
JET's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ham Lake
Drives: like a bat outta hell!
Posts: 7,983
Send a message via AIM to JET Send a message via Yahoo to JET
Re: Long rod motors?

The longer rods will give the rod a shallower angle. This reduces side load on the pistons, and as John stated, increases the dwell time. Dwell time is good in an NA application, you can make more power. In a FI engine with high boost, it is not desirable since we are fighting detonation and that gives more time for detonation to occur.

The rod ratio of the 2.4 is 1.5 and the long rod version is 1.56. 1.7 is considered ideal for a NA engine. I really don't see a big enough difference with the long rod version to warrant the extra cost. It is less than a 10% difference in rod ratio and there are some bad effects too.
__________________
Is burning corn and stayin' warm!

My motorcycle is stock and reliable, my Talon is neither!
JET is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.