MitsuStyle MitsuStyle

Go Back   MitsuStyle > The Classifieds > Want to buy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-29-2010   #1
howslowcanyougo
Older than Dirt...
 
howslowcanyougo's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Inver Grove
Drives: IX EVO MR/SE
Posts: 483
Re: WTB; Clean, unmolested, low mile evo or sti....

The problem we all know is that modding it and beating it can mess it up forever, depending on who's doing it! I personally would rather pay the extra cash up front not to pay for someone elses mistakes on <and in> the backside! Also please correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't the IX's lighter and quicker in general than the X's. In anycase I like the way the IX's look better, and have a long, sick and twisted love affair with the old 4G63 that I just can't seem to shake......:->
__________________
Let the madness begin...
howslowcanyougo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2010   #2
mlomker
*Resting In Peace*
 
mlomker's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Heaven
Drives: 94 Plymouth Acclaim/2008 EvoX
Posts: 2,430
Re: WTB; Clean, unmolested, low mile evo or sti....

Quote:
Originally Posted by howslowcanyougo View Post
aren't the IX's lighter and quicker in general than the X's.
Yup. Crash ratings, etc require cars to have more weight now.

That car is a built FP Red car. It'll be just a little faster than the stock IX. RS Motors built it so I guess your opinion of them will decide the rest of your concerns.
__________________
Modlist / Dyno Graphs / Facebook

kracka--It's official, Lomker sucks at chicks!
mlomker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.