Interesting dynojet article

**Halon** · 12-15-2006

I'm not in anyway saying your dyno is bad. Apparently it is one of the better dynos out there. Never said your dyno was bad. All I'm saying is I wish the numbers of all the dynos were closer, maybe standardized or something, because it does lead to confusion when I show people my chart and they say "damn that's weak" and then I go to explain that these dynos read low, and to do this math to figure out about what it would maybe be compared to theirs. Just kinda confusing. That make sense?

niterydr · 12-15-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by ju-on

I'm not in anyway saying your dyno is bad. Apparently it is one of the better dynos out there. Never said your dyno was bad. All I'm saying is I wish the numbers of all the dynos were closer, maybe standardized or something, because it does lead to confusion when I show people my chart and they say "damn that's weak" and then I go to explain that these dynos read low, and to do this math to figure out about what it would maybe be compared to theirs. Just kinda confusing. That make sense?

Makes perfect sence.
Don't worry, many of the industry leading facilities are switching dyno manufactures...that is another "fact". Dyno Dynamics is getting more and more popular across the US.