Swifty's never-ending project thread! - Page 12

**mlomker** · 02-04-2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swifty1638

it's a GT4294. it made over 640 on a awd dyno dynamics, 36 psi, e fuel.

Fuk. Is the rest of your car built to take that?

**scheides** · 02-05-2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swifty1638

Well, I was waiting to post anything up, but scheides kinda forced the hand.

Whatever punk, you mentioned UPS coming with your new turbo in the shoutbox multiple times, then were talking about it, blah blah blah....don't try so hard to pretend to be a wallflower when you know you're an attention-whore :P

Swifty1638 · 02-04-2010

lol, yes, the rest of the car should be well equipped to handle said turbo. I'm shooting for 40-45 psi, IF it will take it. I am trying to decide if I'll get a new knock sensor, and if it will be a 2g again, or a 1g..Shane?

At-Least-It's-An-Evo · 02-05-2010

The 67 didn't want to spool on your car...like it does on other DSMs. Two words: hello lag.

Matt D. · 02-05-2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by At-Least-It's-An-Evo

The 67 didn't want to spool on your car...like it does on other DSMs. Two words: hello lag.

Hello 1000RPM of usable powerband.

**mlomker** · 02-05-2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt D.

Hello 1000RPM of usable powerband.

I assume he's building the head for 9k rpm or somesuch.

**scheides** · 02-05-2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by mlomker

I assume he's building the head for 9k rpm or somesuch.

If you read back through this thread, this car has been plagued with a solid rev limit of like 7949rpm or something exact and he hasn't really been able to figure it out. I say put a hta68 on it and you have the perfect street car/drag brawler.

**scheides** · 02-05-2010

So, what are you going to do if you still have this 8k rev limit? You'll have like 1000rpm-wide powerband...back to stock ECU and/or ignition? Otherwise I vote twin-scroll 6262 since you'll have the manifold setup for it

C3L1CA · 02-05-2010

Did you ever figure out the reving issue?

Thats a pretty cool turbo tho, hope you put it to good use!

A//// Guy · 02-05-2010

Yea I dunno, big turbos are cool. But I would have stuck the money into fixing the ignition issues, and maybe a paint job.

I like having power for more than 2k rpm too. Just doesnt seem fun.

Matt D. · 02-05-2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by mlomker

I assume he's building the head for 9k rpm or somesuch.

Even then I bet he has less than 3000 RPM of usable power, and as of right now he can't even get the car to rev past 8000.

Quote:

Originally Posted by A//// Guy

I like having power for more than 2k rpm too. Just doesnt seem fun.

Low end power is for pussies.

turbotalon1g · 02-05-2010

For drag racing he might need 2k of power.

A//// Guy · 02-05-2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by turbotalon1g

For drag racing he might need 2k of power.

But hes never drag raced. haha

tpunx99GSX · 02-05-2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by A//// Guy

But hes never drag raced. haha

Swifty1638 · 02-05-2010

We think the rev limiter issue has been fixed, as everything else has been looked over, ohmd, tested, etc. The valvesprings couldn't keep up with my cams, especially since they where not properly shimmed, but rather thrown into the head, like most of us would do.

Lag. I don't really care. I like the fact that it's laggy, in all honesty. Regular driving, the car is easy, like a honda, and when I want power, just downshift. You all act like it's soooo hard to find the powerband and drive in it.

Small ass turbos don't make the power I wish for. Plain and Simple. Who knows when I'll stop, but right now I am still working things out.

For a second there, I thought I was reading another swifty bashing thread, not a BUILD/PROJECT thread...

tpunx99GSX · 02-05-2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by swifty1638

lag. I don't really care. I like the fact that it's laggy, in all honesty. Regular driving, the car is easy, like a honda, and when i want power, just downshift. You all act like it's soooo hard to find the powerband and drive in it.

Small ass turbos don't make the power i wish for. Plain and simple. Who knows when i'll stop, but right now i am still working things out.

truf.

Matt D. · 02-05-2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swifty1638

Small ass turbos don't make the power I wish for. Plain and Simple. Who knows when I'll stop, but right now I am still working things out.

You seem to constantly be working things out. When was the last time you stuck with a setup long enough to even attempt to achieve the maximum potential of that setup? Not hating, just calling it as I see it. You're kind of like a dog chasing a car, but you never catch the car because you start chasing another car that just passed you going the opposite direction.

turbotalon1g · 02-05-2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swifty1638

We think the rev limiter issue has been fixed, as everything else has been looked over, ohmd, tested, etc. The valvesprings couldn't keep up with my cams, especially since they where not properly shimmed, but rather thrown into the head, like most of us would do.

Lag. I don't really care. I like the fact that it's laggy, in all honesty. Regular driving, the car is easy, like a honda, and when I want power, just downshift. You all act like it's soooo hard to find the powerband and drive in it.

Small ass turbos don't make the power I wish for. Plain and Simple. Who knows when I'll stop, but right now I am still working things out.

For a second there, I thought I was reading another swifty bashing thread, not a BUILD/PROJECT thread...

Please don't try to involve, group the rest of us in your failures. Most of us are not wanna be cool asshats.

Swifty1638 · 02-05-2010

huh? I said not many people measure, check, and shim their valvesprings? Did you?

**Shane@DBPerformance** · 02-05-2010

We do on all the valvesprings and valves we do on heads, unless someone really wants them thrown in ghetto/internetz style without removing the head.