10-27-2003
|
#2
|
Admin
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sportsman's Paradise, LA.
Posts: 5,382
|
It all has to do with this, ASK RAPTOR :P
It has to do with where the weight is placed in the design of the wheel (more weight at the center or hub of the wheel, or more to the outside of the wheel), the diameter of the wheel, the weight and diameter of the rotor, etc. Inertia, accelerating forces applied to the wheel and kenetic energy all play a factor. That's a tough answer to put together when you look at all the variables. It would be better to try different wheels or rotors while noting their weight properties and designs and make some data sheets to compile the effects between different designs.
When all else fails, ASK RAPTOR 
__________________
"You don't have a clue. You couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance."
When she get's bitchy, SPANK THAT ASS! (#Y#)
|
|
|
10-28-2003
|
#3
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 252
|
I = 1/2m r^2 that is the equation to find inertia of a solid sphere. which is close enough to a rim
|
|
|
10-28-2003
|
#4
|
Admin
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sportsman's Paradise, LA.
Posts: 5,382
|
__________________
"You don't have a clue. You couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance."
When she get's bitchy, SPANK THAT ASS! (#Y#)
|
|
|
10-28-2003
|
#5
|
Asshat King
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Decorah / Ames, Iowa
Posts: 3,683
|
Quote:
Originally posted by jd1828@Oct 28 2003, 04:00 PM
I = 1/2m r^2 that is the equation to find inertia of a solid sphere. which is close enough to a rim
|
Ummm, moment of inertia of a solid sphere is (2mR^2)/5.
Moment of inertia for a solid cylinder is (mR^2)/2 which is what a rim + tire could be respectively considered.
__________________
DSMSTYLE MAFIA - Holdin' Down the Cornfields of IA
'92 Laser RS AWD & '01 Grand Prix GTP
Proud to be a Cyclone
Check it out: Racers Against Street Racing
|
|
|
10-28-2003
|
#6
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 252
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Jakey@Oct 28 2003, 04:10 PM
Ummm, moment of inertia of a solid sphere is (2mR^2)/5.
Moment of inertia for a solid cylinder is (mR^2)/2 which is what a rim + tire could be respectively considered.
|
i ment cylinder not sphere
|
|
|
10-28-2003
|
#7
|
Reynolds number user
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: grove/tempe
Posts: 3,553
|
so how many dooods on here have had to take physics/calc?
__________________
07 Ducati Monster S4R
00 honda elite 50 (64 mph braH!)
05 malaguti F15
04 E55 AMG
|
|
|
10-28-2003
|
#9
|
Sten Sniper
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Hope
Drives: Evo VIII RS
Posts: 1,385
|
I think the most basic/simplified/non-mathamatical way to figure it is:
-10lbs = +1hp
Multiply by 4 for rotational weight.
|
|
|
10-28-2003
|
#10
|
Asshat King
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Decorah / Ames, Iowa
Posts: 3,683
|
Quote:
Originally posted by gixxer@Oct 28 2003, 09:28 PM
so how many dooods on here have had to take physics/calc?
|
I'm in my first of two physics classes right now. I had two semesters of calc last year and have to take differential equations this spring.
__________________
DSMSTYLE MAFIA - Holdin' Down the Cornfields of IA
'92 Laser RS AWD & '01 Grand Prix GTP
Proud to be a Cyclone
Check it out: Racers Against Street Racing
|
|
|
10-28-2003
|
#11
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 252
|
ive taken 2.5 years of physics if you count both highschool and college. im currently near failing calc right now.
as for you question, there is a way to relate it to horsepower but it is not easy. there are some other things you will
need to know.
a number for the change in rpm of the tire and the inertia of the tire.
now for some crazy math stuff. i do problems like this a lots so they are not too bad for me
1.take the change in rpm of the tire and change that into radians per sec. then divide by the
total time of the change. that will give you radians per sec^2. this is your rotational acceleration
2.then mutiply by the inertia which gives you an average torque during the time period
3.take the change in rpm and change it into radians per sec
4.mutiply by the torque in #2 which gives you foot pounds force per sec.
5 divide by (1hp/550 foot pounds force per sec) this gives your horsepower
that looks about right to me.
|
|
|
10-29-2003
|
#12
|
Reynolds number user
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: grove/tempe
Posts: 3,553
|
i'm in calc 271 right now, calc 2 i guess. it sucks huge ass, its so goddamn hard. what majors are all of you foolios going for?
i'm attempting Mech. Eng here, but i still have a long way to go
__________________
07 Ducati Monster S4R
00 honda elite 50 (64 mph braH!)
05 malaguti F15
04 E55 AMG
|
|
|
10-29-2003
|
#13
|
Asshat King
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Decorah / Ames, Iowa
Posts: 3,683
|
Quote:
Originally posted by gixxer@Oct 29 2003, 12:04 AM
i'm in calc 271 right now, calc 2 i guess. it sucks huge ass, its so goddamn hard. what majors are all of you foolios going for?
i'm attempting Mech. Eng here, but i still have a long way to go
|
I'm in my second year in the power & machinery area of Iowa State's agricultural engineering program. It is damn close to mechanical engineering but agricultural based.
__________________
DSMSTYLE MAFIA - Holdin' Down the Cornfields of IA
'92 Laser RS AWD & '01 Grand Prix GTP
Proud to be a Cyclone
Check it out: Racers Against Street Racing
|
|
|
10-29-2003
|
#14
|
R U DTF bro?
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oak Point, TX
Drives: C8 Stingray Z51
Posts: 20,620
|
Business Finance major with a Psychology minor. This semester I am taking Calc I for the 2nd time and god damn I am failing it again! I just am not able to figure out this spatial shit...I get striaght A's in my other math courses (statistics for example), but this calculus junk just can not be related to real-life in a not pointless way. CVD: add calculus to your list.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26
I agree with Kracka.
|
|
|
|
10-29-2003
|
#15
|
Reynolds number user
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: grove/tempe
Posts: 3,553
|
don't worry dude, i took calc 1 three times at my shitty old community college before i got it right (kinda) its seriously ALL ABOUT THE TEACHER. they can make the material hell, or they can make it easy to digest, but either way way its fucking gay.
__________________
07 Ducati Monster S4R
00 honda elite 50 (64 mph braH!)
05 malaguti F15
04 E55 AMG
|
|
|
10-29-2003
|
#16
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 252
|
im in calc 1 for the second time and will probably be in it for a 3rd time
|
|
|
10-29-2003
|
#17
|
Asshat King
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Decorah / Ames, Iowa
Posts: 3,683
|
Quote:
Originally posted by gixxer@Oct 29 2003, 12:33 PM
..... its seriously ALL ABOUT THE TEACHER. they can make the material hell, or they can make it easy to digest, but either way way its fucking gay.
|
I totally agree with that, I was fortunate enough to get an awesome teacher for Calc I and Calc II.
__________________
DSMSTYLE MAFIA - Holdin' Down the Cornfields of IA
'92 Laser RS AWD & '01 Grand Prix GTP
Proud to be a Cyclone
Check it out: Racers Against Street Racing
|
|
|
10-29-2003
|
#19
|
Admin
|
How can you convert lost weight into gained hp? Horsepower is not a function of the weight of your wheels. If you're talking about lighter pistons or flywheel or something, then you can gain some power. But even if you had no wheels on your car at all, it would still have the same power at the crank as if you had 400 lb wheels on it.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|