MitsuStyle MitsuStyle

Go Back   MitsuStyle > Hosted Support Forums > Modern Automotive Performance

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-29-2007   #1
Shane@DBPerformance
formerly ecoli
 
Shane@DBPerformance's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On the dyno
Posts: 4,892
Send a message via AIM to Shane@DBPerformance
Re: 709whp from Modern Automotive Performance!

If this car made 542@LSE then it would take around 31% more to get to these numbers. It took about 18% to get from the 405awhp or Alex's car to his 479whp number at MAP. It's hard to compare though, unless nothing changed. Mara's car was about 21% from Elite to our dyno, but the dyno runs were a good 3 months apart. A few Evos that I have dynoed, that have also dyno on AWD Dynojets have taken about 18% more from our numbers to get to the Dynojet AWD numbers. The difference between Dynojet FWD and Dynojet AWD numbers seems to be very little.
__________________
www.dbptuning.com

Last edited by Shane@DBPerformance; 04-29-2007 at 04:28 PM..
Shane@DBPerformance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007   #2
dumb_ricer
Hates Everything
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Drives: Neon
Posts: 445
Send a message via AIM to dumb_ricer
Re: 709whp from Modern Automotive Performance!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ecoli View Post
If this car made 542@LSE then it would take around 31% more to get to these numbers. It took about 18% to get from the 405awhp or Alex's car to his 479whp number at MAP. It's hard to compare though, unless nothing changed. Mara's car was about 21% from Elite to our dyno, but the dyno runs were a good 3 months apart. A few Evos that I have dynoed, that have also dyno on AWD Dynojets have taken about 18% more from our numbers to get to the Dynojet AWD numbers. The difference between Dynojet FWD and Dynojet AWD numbers seems to be very little.
Kyle's car we really can't even compare. It wasn't running right, especially with the state of his tune above 7500RPM. We don't even know what it did up there. I don't have a dyno graph showing his Air/Fuel above 7700RPM, so we didn't tune for up to their, lol.

It actually took somewhere between 15 and 16 percent for Alex's car. 479*.85=407.2(15percent) and 479*.84=402.4(16percent). That is between FWD and AWD (10-15whp?) and Dynojet to Dyno Dynamics. I'm sure it gets different as power levels go up though. His boost wasn't changed, so the power is going to be pretty damn close. I don't think he added/removed more than 2 percent anywhere to stop the miss he was having. We found out that it may not have been a tuning issue at all though, and that there might be some EMI with the Vibrant Spark Plug cover we were using on both cars. As soon as he removed that, the miss went away, and we did NOT use the spark plug cover on our dyno for either cars. Kyle left his on at LSE, and Alex took his off to check plugs and never put it back on. Its all speculation at this point.

If either of you two shops with Dyno Dynamics are down, I could do a pull with my car (04 GTO, stockish) on our dyno and then drive up to one of your shops and we could do a pull up there to see what the difference is. I would disconnect the battery terminal before I dynoed here, and do the same up there. My PCM won't change the tune AT ALL for at least 10 minutes after I reset the PCM, so numbers would vary only by temperature pretty much.

And Kyles car looks like it was around 23 percent down on power.............709*.77=545. Either you two are doing math wrong or I am, haha.
__________________
420A > LS1 > All Else
Superchargers > Nitrous > Turbochargers
I > All else

Last edited by dumb_ricer; 04-29-2007 at 04:46 PM..
dumb_ricer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.