08-12-2009
|
#1
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Suburbs
Drives: FS-T
Posts: 346
|
Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RdrstGR6aQ
Car is dope on the inside! I think it looks pretty sick on the outside as well. AWD Twin Turbo 3.5 V6 , 365 bhp 350 tq (1,500 - 5,000 rpms you get 350 tq)!!
|
|
|
08-12-2009
|
#2
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Rochester, MN
Drives: 1997 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX
Posts: 184
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
thats one bad ass ford
__________________
97' Eclipse gsx - 14b/16g turbo apex dunk exhaust apexi intake walbro 255 whp-???
|
|
|
08-12-2009
|
#3
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Suburbs
Drives: FS-T
Posts: 346
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
Model - Taurus
SHO AWD
$37,170
PACKAGES
402A
$3,000
EXTERIOR
*Tuxedo Black Metallic $0
*Auto High Beam $0
*Rain Sensing Wipers $0
*Reverse Sensing System $0
*19" Premium Painted Luster Nickel Aluminum Wheels $0
INTERIOR
*Charcoal Black/Umber $0
*Heated/Cooled Front Seats $0
*Rear Power Sunshade $0
*Second-Row Heated Seats $0
*Multi-Contour Seats with Active Motion(TM) $595
*Intelligent Access with Push-Button Start $0
*Power Moonroof $0
*Memory Power-Adjustable Pedals $0
*Adaptive Cruise Control $1,195
*Blind Spot Information System (BLIS(R)) w/Cross- Traffic Alert $0
*Rear View Camera $0
*Ambient Lighting $0
*Voice-Activated Navigation with SIRIUS Travel Link(TM) $1,695
*SIRIUS(R) Satellite Radio $0
*Sony(R) 12-speaker Audio System $0
*SYNC(R) $0
*Front Buckets with Miko(R) Suede Inserts $0
ACCESSORIES
*All-Weather Floor Mats $75
|
|
|
08-12-2009
|
#4
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Blaine
Drives: 1991 talon tsi, 1991 stealth
Posts: 788
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
i think there are better cars in the sub 40k catagory
edit, cant say i dont like the engine though, could have done a bit about the body though, still kinda fugly
Last edited by viridionplague; 08-12-2009 at 01:46 AM..
|
|
|
08-12-2009
|
#5
|
Braaaaaaaap!
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Fridley
Drives: '09 Silveraydo
Posts: 2,028
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
thats the best looking taurus i've seen! lol but yah for 40k,.......
|
|
|
08-12-2009
|
#6
|
Built it from scratch!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: St. Paul
Drives: Currently Mitsu-less
Posts: 851
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
ECO BOOST!!!!
HA HA HA HA
I am stealing one of those badges for my car!!!
__________________
"A turbo, exhaust gasses go into the turbocharger and spin it, witchcraft happens and you go faster."
|
|
|
08-12-2009
|
#7
|
R U DTF bro?
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oak Point, TX
Drives: C8 Stingray Z51
Posts: 20,620
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
Wow...$40k for a Toreass?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26
I agree with Kracka.
|
|
|
|
08-12-2009
|
#8
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cottage Grove
Drives: Silver '02 IS300, Blue '06 Suzuki SV1000
Posts: 5,293
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
Holy balls that's overpriced!
__________________
'02 Lexus IS300
'06 Suzuki SV1000: Back on the road and ripping hard as ever!
|
|
|
08-12-2009
|
#9
|
At-Least-It's-White-Again
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
Reading your description, it sounded really cool. Then I clicked on the video and instantly became uninterested. That shit's ugly.
__________________
'04 Honda Ricer: stock
Done fuckin' with cars but I will snap some photos of yours for now! =)
|
|
|
08-12-2009
|
#10
|
Who has my man-card?
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Crystal MN
Drives: a red car
Posts: 2,162
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kracka
Wow...$40k for a Toreass?
|
aka tortoise
Edmunds compared it to the G37 and here are a couple quotes...
Quote:
The 2010 Ford Taurus has undoubtedly picked up right where the last 1999 Ford Taurus SHO left off. The problem is, this is not the year 2000.
|
Quote:
In the end, the 2010 Ford Taurus SHO feels like an excellent all-new Taurus with a muscular engine, period. It's not quite up to the sport sedan badge.
|
Quote:
Impressive engine, clever features, bold styling, yet the resurrected SHO isn't sharp enough and costs to much.
|
Quote:
So What Does the SHO Do Well?
Freeways and two-lane on-ramps to freeways, and that's where the original SHO's sleeper-sedan directive lives on. Sure, the SHO comes up short compared to a G37 at a drag strip on a slalom course, but compared to other cars of its size and mass (or smaller), it's quick and it sticks. You should've seen the look on the guy's face in the Dale Earnhardt Signature Edition Monte Carlo when we went around him on the outside while merging onto the freeway.
|
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=151726
Last edited by rose0529; 08-12-2009 at 08:11 AM..
|
|
|
08-12-2009
|
#11
|
R U DTF bro?
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oak Point, TX
Drives: C8 Stingray Z51
Posts: 20,620
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
LOL @ Monte Carlo comment
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26
I agree with Kracka.
|
|
|
|
08-12-2009
|
#12
|
'2of9'
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Inver Grove Heights
Drives: Racer Van V6
Posts: 2,125
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
I watched the Edmund's test. the Taurus vs the G37....yeah, i'd still take the G37.
__________________
ლ(ಠ益ಠლ)
|
|
|
08-12-2009
|
#13
|
R U DTF bro?
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oak Point, TX
Drives: C8 Stingray Z51
Posts: 20,620
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
The Evo X will walk all over it; for less money.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26
I agree with Kracka.
|
|
|
|
08-12-2009
|
#14
|
Transmission destroyer
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cambridge
Drives: G37, 91 TSi
Posts: 7,150
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
meh...if it was 25k instead of 40k I'd be inpressed
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by scheides
I swing from the nuts of cold hard data. Anything less is a guess.
|
|
|
|
08-12-2009
|
#15
|
Pewp Champion
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Blaine
Drives: Teh Bean
Posts: 12,309
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
I personally don't feel that this and an Evo X fall under the same grouping to even be compared.
IMO a car like this would be better compared to something like a G8, Charger R/T, or Impala SS.
|
|
|
08-12-2009
|
#16
|
Who has my man-card?
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Crystal MN
Drives: a red car
Posts: 2,162
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
I would say the X MR Touring package that is coming out is pretty good competition for it. MSRP $41,960 South coast mitsu is selling them for $38,999
quoted from RussellM on evolutionm.net
Quote:
Originally Posted by RussellM
2010 EVOLUTION X
GSR & MR- Tail Lamps with Black Extensions
- Short Pole Antenna - 200mm
- New Odor de-composing headliner
- Improved E-TACS functions, including windshield comfort washer function
- New solar UV control front door glass
- Newly styled high-contrast meter design with full color LCD Multi-Function Information Display (MID)
- Leather Parking brake lever w/ chrome release button
- Front cup holder w/ lid
- Center console mounted ACD switch
- New Large side air dam design
- Hands Free Bluetooth cell phone interface system w/ voice recognition microphone
- MP3/Aux Stereo input jack added to non RF equipped cars
Additional Options- Rockford Fostgate premium Audio system w/ power upgrade and 6cd/mp3 changer (Premium GSR Options (standard on MR) )
- Sirius Satellite Radio w/ 3 months prepaid subscription (Premium GSR Options (standard on MR) )
- Rotor Glow Orange Metallic Color (GSR only)
- Additional Phantom Black Interior Accents with storage compartments (MR ONLY)
Option Packages
Touring Package - MR- Power Glass Sunroof
- Leather Seating Surfaces
- Heated Front Seats and Outer Door Mirros
- Rear Lip Spoiler, Replaces Large Rear Spoiler
- Center Console Storage w/ lids
- Automatic on/off Headlamps w/ rain sensing wipers
- Insulated front winshield glass
- Improved Sound Insulation
|
Last edited by rose0529; 08-12-2009 at 11:55 AM..
|
|
|
08-12-2009
|
#17
|
Pewp Champion
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Blaine
Drives: Teh Bean
Posts: 12,309
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
I disagree. A Lancer is more compact than a Tauras, atleast in my perspective. It's one size bigger in my eyes. Like a Lancer and Galant, Altima and Maxima, Fusion and Tauras. A Lancer and Tauras just isn't apples to apples in my mind. An Evo will walk all over a Tauras at the track sure. Same as an Evo would walk all over a Galant GTZ at the track also. They are different animals, aimed at accompishing slightly different things.
Just my opinion
I do think the G37 was a decent comparison though. Similar sized cars, aimed at a similar crowd and a similar goal.
|
|
|
08-12-2009
|
#18
|
Who has my man-card?
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Crystal MN
Drives: a red car
Posts: 2,162
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
Good point on size, I guess I'm going on the 40k semi lux AWD turbo car, ie a fun DD.... Just depends on how you look at it.
|
|
|
08-12-2009
|
#19
|
R U DTF bro?
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oak Point, TX
Drives: C8 Stingray Z51
Posts: 20,620
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halon
I personally don't feel that this and an Evo X fall under the same grouping to even be compared.
IMO a car like this would be better compared to something like a G8, Charger R/T, or Impala SS.
|
The reason I made the comment is because they're both right around the same price-point. Sure they're in different classes, but so are DSM's and 3/S's yet people always compared those. Anything can be compared, you just need to remember the differences and what exactly you're looking at.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26
I agree with Kracka.
|
|
|
|
08-12-2009
|
#20
|
Pewp Champion
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Blaine
Drives: Teh Bean
Posts: 12,309
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
OK, but a comment such as "an Evo will walk all over it" is pretty one sided and generic. An Evo will walk all over a G37 for less money also, and an Acura TL, but who cares when they are built with a different purpose and goal in mind? I'm going to go on a limb and say that this car was not built with a stearn mindset that most of them will see real track time. I'd guess they were probably going for more along the lines of a 4dr comfy family car that has some good get up n go and can be fun on the street, while still keeping the in-laws happy and cozy in the back seat, with a not so overly "look at me" look, yet still being a little edgier than the norm.
I bet there is more interior space, more trunk space, and a slightly smoother ride than an Evo X MR.
Don't get me wrong, I'd take the Evo over it anyday. But I can guarantee you my dad would choose the opposite.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|