![]() |
Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RdrstGR6aQ
Car is dope on the inside! I think it looks pretty sick on the outside as well. AWD Twin Turbo 3.5 V6, 365 bhp 350 tq (1,500 - 5,000 rpms you get 350 tq)!! |
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
thats one bad ass ford
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
Model - Taurus
SHO AWD $37,170 PACKAGES 402A $3,000 EXTERIOR *Tuxedo Black Metallic $0 *Auto High Beam $0 *Rain Sensing Wipers $0 *Reverse Sensing System $0 *19" Premium Painted Luster Nickel Aluminum Wheels $0 INTERIOR *Charcoal Black/Umber $0 *Heated/Cooled Front Seats $0 *Rear Power Sunshade $0 *Second-Row Heated Seats $0 *Multi-Contour Seats with Active Motion(TM) $595 *Intelligent Access with Push-Button Start $0 *Power Moonroof $0 *Memory Power-Adjustable Pedals $0 *Adaptive Cruise Control $1,195 *Blind Spot Information System (BLIS(R)) w/Cross- Traffic Alert $0 *Rear View Camera $0 *Ambient Lighting $0 *Voice-Activated Navigation with SIRIUS Travel Link(TM) $1,695 *SIRIUS(R) Satellite Radio $0 *Sony(R) 12-speaker Audio System $0 *SYNC(R) $0 *Front Buckets with Miko(R) Suede Inserts $0 ACCESSORIES *All-Weather Floor Mats $75 |
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
i think there are better cars in the sub 40k catagory
edit, cant say i dont like the engine though, could have done a bit about the body though, still kinda fugly |
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
thats the best looking taurus i've seen! lol but yah for 40k,.......
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
ECO BOOST!!!!
HA HA HA HA I am stealing one of those badges for my car!!! |
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
Wow...$40k for a Toreass?
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
Holy balls that's overpriced!
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
Reading your description, it sounded really cool. Then I clicked on the video and instantly became uninterested. That shit's ugly.
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
Quote:
Edmunds compared it to the G37 and here are a couple quotes... Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
LOL @ Monte Carlo comment
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
I watched the Edmund's test. the Taurus vs the G37....yeah, i'd still take the G37.
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
The Evo X will walk all over it; for less money.
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
meh...if it was 25k instead of 40k I'd be inpressed
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
I personally don't feel that this and an Evo X fall under the same grouping to even be compared.
IMO a car like this would be better compared to something like a G8, Charger R/T, or Impala SS. |
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
I would say the X MR Touring package that is coming out is pretty good competition for it. MSRP $41,960 South coast mitsu is selling them for $38,999
quoted from RussellM on evolutionm.net Quote:
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
I disagree. A Lancer is more compact than a Tauras, atleast in my perspective. It's one size bigger in my eyes. Like a Lancer and Galant, Altima and Maxima, Fusion and Tauras. A Lancer and Tauras just isn't apples to apples in my mind. An Evo will walk all over a Tauras at the track sure. Same as an Evo would walk all over a Galant GTZ at the track also. They are different animals, aimed at accompishing slightly different things.
Just my opinion :) I do think the G37 was a decent comparison though. Similar sized cars, aimed at a similar crowd and a similar goal. |
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
Good point on size, I guess I'm going on the 40k semi lux AWD turbo car, ie a fun DD.... Just depends on how you look at it.
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
Quote:
|
Re: Ford Taurus SHO 2010 Driving and Interior
OK, but a comment such as "an Evo will walk all over it" is pretty one sided and generic. An Evo will walk all over a G37 for less money also, and an Acura TL, but who cares when they are built with a different purpose and goal in mind? I'm going to go on a limb and say that this car was not built with a stearn mindset that most of them will see real track time. I'd guess they were probably going for more along the lines of a 4dr comfy family car that has some good get up n go and can be fun on the street, while still keeping the in-laws happy and cozy in the back seat, with a not so overly "look at me" look, yet still being a little edgier than the norm.
I bet there is more interior space, more trunk space, and a slightly smoother ride than an Evo X MR. Don't get me wrong, I'd take the Evo over it anyday. But I can guarantee you my dad would choose the opposite. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.