No More Bashing Threads! Discuss...

[Kracka]

Originally Posted by cmspaz

It was a vocalized offhand curiosity with an implied threat if read in context. And you can't say that it wasn't, Hughes.

I obviously misread then and was wrong in not banning you too. Implied threat or not, it is still not an excuse for what ensued on this board.

[ylimert01]

Originally Posted by cmspaz

It was a vocalized offhand curiosity with an implied threat if read in context. And you can't say that it wasn't, Hughes.

so wait now your saying it was a possible threat?? ok so thats not cool, 4 people got banned because of you...maybe u need some time to think about things too ...

[cmspaz]

Originally Posted by ylimert01

so wait now your saying it was a possible threat?? ok so thats not cool, 4 people got banned because of you...maybe u need some time to think about things too...

Firstly, for the record, 2 people were banned because they didn't shut up when asked to, and three more were banned because they wanted to make some sort of statement.

Secondly, was the implication there? Yes. Did I seriously mean it? No. Is it fair that I'm not banned? Probably not, but that's not my call to make.

[scheides]

Originally Posted by cmspaz

It was a vocalized offhand curiosity with an implied threat if read in context. And you can't say that it wasn't, Hughes.

If that's the case then, enjoy your ban along with the others. See you friday

[ylimert01]

Originally Posted by cmspaz

Firstly, for the record, 2 people were banned because they didn't shut up when asked to, and three more were banned because they wanted to make some sort of statement.

Secondly, was the implication there? Yes. Did I seriously mean it? No. Is it fair that I'm not banned? Probably not, but that's not my call to make.

I am glad the bashing threads will be gone! maybe we can move on and learn from this as a group...see ya all fri at hooters.

[Kracka]

Originally Posted by cmspaz

Firstly, for the record, 2 people were banned because they didn't shut up when asked to, and three more were banned because they wanted to make some sort of statement.

Secondly, was the implication there? Yes. Did I seriously mean it? No. Is it fair that I'm not banned? Probably not, but that's not my call to make.

Your first statement is correct; the 5 were banned for the reasons you listed.

I appreciate your honesty and owning up to your mistake.

[slowbubblecar]

lol, spaz talked himself into that one