06-18-2008
|
#1
|
|
Shit Rocket Pilot
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Shoreview, MN
Drives: 2003 Evolution VIII
Posts: 7,752
|
Re: DSM: 16G & Cams
Quote:
Originally Posted by turbotalon1g
i have a question, why do u guys think that power is falling so hard?
Anyway to get that to flatten out rather than fall on its face?
|
A nice intake manifold would help it out, I'm sure.
__________________
"If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough." -Mario Andretti
03 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tachyon
Every minute you spend in your Evo, not in boost, is a minute of your life you'll never get back.
|
|
|
|
06-18-2008
|
#2
|
|
flips McGee
|
Re: DSM: 16G & Cams
Yup, I was just going to say the same thing. Check out Kevin's graph. This is a different turbo, but you'll notice how power does not fall off up top.
http://mitsustyle.com/forums/showpos...3&postcount=39
How much will it help on a 16G? Well, that's a question that I would wonder 
|
|
|
06-18-2008
|
#3
|
|
formerly ecoli
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On the dyno
Posts: 4,892
|
Re: DSM: 16G & Cams
It's a 16G, it probably maxed and it doesn't hold boost. With the 22psi tune, it drops to 21psi by redline. With the 27psi tune it drops to 22psi by redline. So torque/mid range power was up more, but peak was only up 10whp. He has a stock 2G small plenum intake manifold also. Sheetmetal intake manifolds usually help bring up the power past 6500RPMs on 2Gs. It would be interesting to see how much one would help a 16G. I have tuned some setups that had everything for high rpm power, but still couldn't hold power out to revlimiter.
Last edited by Shane@DBPerformance; 06-18-2008 at 10:58 AM..
|
|
|
06-18-2008
|
#4
|
|
flips McGee
|
Re: DSM: 16G & Cams
I am with ya man, but I wonder if it'd really be worth it. The car is mildly unmolested, running a reliable turbo, and making great power for tearing it up on the street....any street!
95tsi, if you ever take your car apart, slap in a JM SMIM and see if it helps  Until then, tear it up!
|
|
|
06-18-2008
|
#5
|
|
formerly ecoli
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On the dyno
Posts: 4,892
|
Re: DSM: 16G & Cams
My wifes car with an SC61 on it, HKS 272 cams and stock 1G intake manifold starts dropping power after 6500.
|
|
|
06-18-2008
|
#6
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Blaine, MN
Drives: '91 Automagic
Posts: 13,908
|
Re: DSM: 16G & Cams
i was just wondering about boost, cause i know CB only has about a 3psi variation i think.
So i figured that if i could get boost to hold at 29psi, which it should do, i would have a tabletop part in the graph.
|
|
|
06-18-2008
|
#7
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Blaine, MN
Drives: '91 Automagic
Posts: 13,908
|
Re: DSM: 16G & Cams
Could we get a graph of RPM vs boost?
Thanks to Dave and Shane@ DB for helping people like me make a good/easier cam choice
|
|
|
06-19-2008
|
#8
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Duluth
Drives: a pos
Posts: 722
|
Re: DSM: 16G & Cams
Quote:
Originally Posted by turbotalon1g
Could we get a graph of RPM vs boost?
Thanks to Dave and Shane@ DB for helping people like me make a good/easier cam choice
|

|
|
|
06-20-2008
|
#9
|
|
At-Least-It's-White-Again
|
Re: DSM: 16G & Cams
358awhp on a DD is some good power for a 16g. My (bolt-on 50 trim/Comp 101200 cams'd/stock 1g intake mani) 1g made pretty much the same power (when converted down to a dyno dynamics) and was a little bit laggier. I was on 28-29 psi on 111octane.
This is ancient but a fair comparison. I believe it'd make about 350 on a dyno dynamics nowadays but you can see it was l ike 500 rpms laggier.

__________________
'04 Honda Ricer: stock
Done fuckin' with cars but I will snap some photos of yours for now! =)
|
|
|
06-20-2008
|
#10
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Blaine, MN
Drives: '91 Automagic
Posts: 13,908
|
Re: DSM: 16G & Cams
Thanks dave that is awesome.
Basically i have a boost leak issue and i thought that it was just that, not the turbo, because i have seen a few people hold 27+psi all the way to redline.
|
|
|
06-20-2008
|
#11
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Blaine, MN
Drives: '91 Automagic
Posts: 13,908
|
Re: DSM: 16G & Cams
I just hate the way the car feels like its eating its face before redline.
|
|
|
06-20-2008
|
#12
|
|
Shit Rocket Pilot
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Shoreview, MN
Drives: 2003 Evolution VIII
Posts: 7,752
|
Re: DSM: 16G & Cams
Quote:
Originally Posted by turbotalon1g
I just hate the way the car feels like its eating its face before redline.
|
That's why I autocross, 1st and 2nd gear always feel fast. 
__________________
"If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough." -Mario Andretti
03 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tachyon
Every minute you spend in your Evo, not in boost, is a minute of your life you'll never get back.
|
|
|
|
06-20-2008
|
#13
|
|
formerly ecoli
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On the dyno
Posts: 4,892
|
Re: DSM: 16G & Cams
Quote:
Originally Posted by turbotalon1g
I just hate the way the car feels like its eating its face before redline.
|
You have a 16G. You don't need to rev it to redline. You don't want a stroker then either. Even with cams, big turbo and sheetmetal intake manifold, they usually have peak power around 6500 and fade after that.
|
|
|
06-20-2008
|
#14
|
|
flips McGee
|
Re: DSM: 16G & Cams
No doubt aaron! Just shift yo!
Notice how on the graph that cher posted, the top end is a little better w/ the 50-trim. This is probably a direct result of being able to hold more boost at redline. Boost taper is a reality (and even more prevelant in evos), holding a flat boost curve on a straight MBC & internal gate is just not gonna happen.
|
|
|
06-20-2008
|
#15
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Blaine, MN
Drives: '91 Automagic
Posts: 13,908
|
Re: DSM: 16G & Cams
\ok, thanks guys. Maybe i will go back to stock cams then.
|
|
|
06-20-2008
|
#16
|
|
flips McGee
|
Re: DSM: 16G & Cams
No, don't be silly. What do you have in there now? 272's? comps?
|
|
|
06-20-2008
|
#17
|
|
Hates blue couplers.
|
Re: DSM: 16G & Cams
I believe he has BC280's and is trying to trade for 272's.
|
|
|
06-20-2008
|
#18
|
|
flips McGee
|
Re: DSM: 16G & Cams
BC cams.....meh.... 
|
|
|
06-21-2008
|
#19
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Blaine, MN
Drives: '91 Automagic
Posts: 13,908
|
Re: DSM: 16G & Cams
^what is that about now sonny?
yes i wish to find \bc 272s as they are the 'smallest' 272 cam out right now, i want to keep as much mid range as possible.
|
|
|
06-21-2008
|
#20
|
|
flips McGee
|
Re: DSM: 16G & Cams
Sorry, I've just seen really really lackluster results from BC cams. Both midrange and up top. Stick with HKS IMHO.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|