MitsuStyle MitsuStyle

Go Back   MitsuStyle > Tech > Tuning/Electrical

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-12-2008   #1
FattyBoomBatty
Banned
 
FattyBoomBatty's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boulder, CO
Drives: Conquest
Posts: 5,049
Re: HID retrofit discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by mx3twinturbo View Post
Results...
incandescent bulb(9006)
*surface temp #1 -857 degrees
*surface temp #2 -913 degrees
*surface temp #3- 970 degrees
HID Bulb(H7)
*surface temp #1 -658 degrees
*surface temp #2 -738 degrees
*surface temp #3 -823 degrees

Conclusion:
HID's run cooler than Incandescent's
I need to question this method of measurement. Did you use an optical temp sensor, like infrared stuff? If so, this can't possible represent the actual temperature of the surface, you could just as well be measuring the temp of the filament in the incandescants, and the gas or whatever it is in the HID's. You need a non-optical reading for surface temps of glass.

My guess is that it will be very different (lower for both). If my headlights are reaching 900 degrees, my car would have caught fire a long time ago.

And it was already addressed, but I would think poor wiring would be the culprit, not the bulbs or ballasts themselves.
FattyBoomBatty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2008   #2
mx3twinturbo
 
mx3twinturbo's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St.Paul MN
Drives: StarQuests>>>>>>
Posts: 189
Re: HID retrofit discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by FattyBoomBatty View Post
I need to question this method of measurement. Did you use an optical temp sensor, like infrared stuff? If so, this can't possible represent the actual temperature of the surface, you could just as well be measuring the temp of the filament in the incandescants, and the gas or whatever it is in the HID's. You need a non-optical reading for surface temps of glass.

My guess is that it will be very different (lower for both). If my headlights are reaching 900 degrees, my car would have caught fire a long time ago.

And it was already addressed, but I would think poor wiring would be the culprit, not the bulbs or ballasts themselves.
agreed to the point of accuracy, just to prove the point that the HID bulbs run cooler,
__________________
1987 Conquest- 2.1 project started...
1986 Dodge D-50- S.C. truck 2.6 turbo swap started
1992 Mazda Mx-3- Rear mount twins in progress
1989 Suburban- Project for too Long!!!

"Just Remember, I HATE Drama"
mx3twinturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2008   #3
mx3twinturbo
 
mx3twinturbo's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St.Paul MN
Drives: StarQuests>>>>>>
Posts: 189
Re: HID retrofit discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by FattyBoomBatty View Post
I need to question this method of measurement. Did you use an optical temp sensor, like infrared stuff? If so, this can't possible represent the actual temperature of the surface, you could just as well be measuring the temp of the filament in the incandescants, and the gas or whatever it is in the HID's. You need a non-optical reading for surface temps of glass.

My guess is that it will be very different (lower for both). If my headlights are reaching 900 degrees, my car would have caught fire a long time ago.

And it was already addressed, but I would think poor wiring would be the culprit, not the bulbs or ballasts themselves.
agreed to the point of accuracy, just to prove the point that the HID bulbs run cooler,
__________________
1987 Conquest- 2.1 project started...
1986 Dodge D-50- S.C. truck 2.6 turbo swap started
1992 Mazda Mx-3- Rear mount twins in progress
1989 Suburban- Project for too Long!!!

"Just Remember, I HATE Drama"
mx3twinturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.