My Evo IX dyno session

[scheides]

Interesting; seems low on the top-end power, probably due to the massive boost taper. Stock intake box I'm guessing? Still, looks like some nice fat torque was there, judging by the shape of the curve and the 300tq figure. Very nice. My VIII put down about that without cams.

And that's 50whp less than hughes' IX, not 30

[9guy9]

Originally Posted by scheides

Interesting; seems low on the top-end power, probably due to the massive boost taper. Stock intake box I'm guessing? Still, looks like some nice fat torque was there, judging by the shape of the curve and the 300tq figure. Very nice. My VIII put down about that without cams.

And that's 50whp less than hughes' IX, not 30

good point, I strugle to count

i had a ebay special filter and mas adapter