Dynoed my Honduh Accord yesterday....

slowHonduh · 05-17-2005

Built shortblock, stock head, stock cams/IM/TB. Using some Turbonetics T3/T4 Hybrid JDM turbo off a Drag gen 9 kit or some shit yo.

Matt D. · 05-17-2005

Nice, but that's a laggy bitch. What engine and internals are you using?

**scheides** · 05-17-2005

nice man. any pics of that beast? Did you put it together yourself, or did someone else build it for ya? Great numbers.

Alpine TSi · 05-17-2005

Hopefully once that bitch gets spooled you can keep it that way. Nice numbers though.

**JET** · 05-17-2005

Nice #'s. It is amazing that a honda 2.2 builds less torque than a mitsu 2.0 though. What boost was that at?

santa · 05-17-2005

nice numbers.

Kevin

slowHonduh · 05-17-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by JET

Nice #'s. It is amazing that a honda 2.2 builds less torque than a mitsu 2.0 though. What boost was that at?

Sorry Jet but you are mistaken. Here's a dyno of John L.'s 2.0 with the same turbo and same boost. Stupid V-tAk

MustGoFaster · 05-17-2005

Could have sworn I posted in this thread!

**JET** · 05-17-2005

He was "only" making 530 whp though, get a graph of a DSM making 604whp once and see what the torque is.

**Shane@DBPerformance** · 05-17-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by JET

He was "only" making 530 whp though, get a graph of a DSM making 604whp once and see what the torque is.

Where are some 600whp 2.0l dyno graphs? Lag makes less torque, if it spooled earlier, it would make more torque. It would be hard to spool that turbo on a 2.0l DSM any quicker though, without a bunch of nitrous, since it has 1.5ls more displacement. When he does cams, intake manifold, etc the torque will probably stay the same, but the HP will go up up up and look more like a VTEC car. The top end power is getting choked bad by all the small stock shit on it.

**JET** · 05-17-2005

Yeah, I can tell he was hitting a wall. That is a 3.5l ?? Seems like a ton of lag for a 3.5l.

At-Least-It's-An-Evo · 05-17-2005

Rice-a-ronie. Shane meant .15 Liters more. Rice rice rice.

At-Least-It's-An-Evo · 05-17-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by NonTurboSpoolinGuest

Rice-a-ronie. Shane meant .15 Liters more. Rice rice rice.

This is a 2.0L DSM making almost the same amount of power. It lacks torque.

StealthGST · 05-17-2005

BUT WHY!? (hehe)

MustGoFaster · 05-17-2005

Cause DSM's are gay, and the slowest thing to ever exist. I'm going to mod my 87 Accord to be just like his car, but I will make more torque with the 2.0L SOHC non VTEC mad phat tyte shit honda motor. Geezz, if this was a DSM (2.0 or 2.4) all of the posts would have said nice numbers, go run some 10's.

StealthGST · 05-17-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by MustGoFaster

Cause DSM's are gay, and the slowest thing to ever exist. I'm going to mod my 87 Accord to be just like his car, but I will make more torque with the 2.0L SOHC non VTEC mad phat tyte shit honda motor. Geezz, if this was a DSM (2.0 or 2.4) all of the posts would have said nice numbers, go run some 10's.

an 87 accord is the most generic car on the fucking road. Get a job that pays more, because I would rather piss on an 87 accord than drive it

Kougar · 05-17-2005

Wow...maybe I should put that set-up in my dumb prelude :O

MustGoFaster · 05-17-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by StealthGST

an 87 accord is the most generic car on the fucking road. Get a job that pays more, because I would rather piss on an 87 accord than drive it

Sarcasm was used there, just to let you know. I happen to have a Galant VR4.

An 87 Accord was my first car.

**JET** · 05-17-2005

I don't have time to look around for dyno graphs, so I will just say I was wrong. Like I said in my first post, nice #'s. It should be good for frum rolls! How much does it weigh?

sleepy2lazy · 05-17-2005

Dsm, Non dsm.
None the less, it still is nice.
#'s look good to me.