03-10-2005
|
#1
|
Now 1 second.....slower!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Paul, MN
Drives: 1993 Talon AWD
Posts: 1,359
|
VR4 top speed.
I dont know much about vr4s, but I heard from a few people that they've topped out at 180 or so. (I didnt believe them). But yeah, whats the top speed on these cars? Just need a quick answer.
|
|
|
03-10-2005
|
#2
|
Is funding Exxon.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ham Lake
Drives: like a bat outta hell!
Posts: 7,983
|
Re: VR4 top speed.
Galant or 3000gt? Neither will get close stock though.
__________________
Is burning corn and stayin' warm!
My motorcycle is stock and reliable, my Talon is neither!
|
|
|
03-10-2005
|
#3
|
Keeper of the lost toys!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mple grove, mn
Drives: 1977 pinto,1994 farm truck, 04 4-door mustang
Posts: 602
|
Re: VR4 top speed.
JOSH claims 170.... at elast thats his story 
__________________
CHRIS
Wayzata Nissan
|
|
|
03-10-2005
|
#4
|
back in the saddle again
|
Re: VR4 top speed.
172, 175, speedo indicated. That was with mbc, filter, gutted cats.
Factory they will do around 155mph in 4th (5spd) and slow down when shifting into 5th gear. They are geared to over 200mph, and a few have gone there with turbo upgrades.
galant vr4? lol, good luck hitting 145 stock.
__________________
My street car runs low 11's and my race car's personal best is a mid 11....
|
|
|
03-10-2005
|
#5
|
Is funding Exxon.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ham Lake
Drives: like a bat outta hell!
Posts: 7,983
|
Re: VR4 top speed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by niterydr
172, 175, speedo indicated.
|
Yeah, that was with your 13" Dayton gold spokes on though. That will throw the speedo off a bit! 
__________________
Is burning corn and stayin' warm!
My motorcycle is stock and reliable, my Talon is neither!
|
|
|
03-10-2005
|
#6
|
back in the saddle again
|
Re: VR4 top speed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JET
Yeah, that was with your 13" Dayton gold spokes on though. That will throw the speedo off a bit! 
|
for shizzy...
__________________
My street car runs low 11's and my race car's personal best is a mid 11....
|
|
|
03-10-2005
|
#7
|
Tournaments Won: 3
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Maple Grove, MN
Drives: Lancer and Durango
Posts: 7,017
|
Re: VR4 top speed.
dont make me bust out the pictures mr bling bling.

__________________
Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge. This is significantly different from the common usage of the word "theory", which implies that something is a conjecture, hypothesis, or guess.
|
|
|
03-10-2005
|
#8
|
Now 1 second.....slower!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Paul, MN
Drives: 1993 Talon AWD
Posts: 1,359
|
Re: VR4 top speed.
I forgot there were two kinds of vr4s, haha. I'm talking about the 3000gt. I was on cardomain and read this guy's page and he was talking about all sorts of weird gadgets on these cars, like the handling stepping up a level once you reach a certain mph. Or the front low spoilers extracting at another mph range and the rear spoiler tilting itself at over 70, for more down force. Do they actually have these or is that guy just dumb. I wouldnt know, but it caught my eye when I read his page. I always thought they were just regular cars with no electronic stuff like that.
|
|
|
03-10-2005
|
#9
|
Is funding Exxon.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ham Lake
Drives: like a bat outta hell!
Posts: 7,983
|
Re: VR4 top speed.
The 300GT VR4 had that aero package as an option. Mainly it was just a marketing ploy and didn't do much. It also added weight.
__________________
Is burning corn and stayin' warm!
My motorcycle is stock and reliable, my Talon is neither!
|
|
|
03-10-2005
|
#10
|
back in the saddle again
|
Re: VR4 top speed.
My car came with: electronically controlled exhaust (electric potato), electronically controlled suspension (good thing, switchable under push button, also under extreme handling conditions it would 'firm up'), digital a/c control/display, 4ws, abs, power all, etc.
The 3000gt's also had the active aero, doesn't work all that well, and since the banana spoiler is the most aerodynamically proven one (or so I've heard) kind of a waste.
fun cars, heavy as hell, but fun.
__________________
My street car runs low 11's and my race car's personal best is a mid 11....
|
|
|
03-10-2005
|
#11
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ramsey, MN
Posts: 476
|
Re: VR4 top speed.
The active exhaust is garbage, but everthing I've read, including first hand accounts and mitsu reports, indicates that the rear spoiler does increase downforce when it's tilted.
And yes 180 is reasonable with the right mods. I clocked a max speed of 169.6 on my stealth via GPS with the same basic mods as Swanny.
There's defintely a lot of gadgets in a 3S. Why do you think they're so heavy?
I've recently realized that I enjoy driving my 1G DSM with a 16G on the street and to work a lot more then my Stealth. And I think the reason is that a 3S doesn't feel like it's fast until you're doing triple digits (which I don't really hit in rush hour). The 3S just isolates you from the road so much better and you have a lot more confidence in the handling, it makes it a boring street car unless you're foolish enough to constantly run at twice the speed limit.
On the other hand 80mph in my 1G feels fast (a lot has to do with the crappy tires and worn out suspension). The 16G is laggy (comparitively) and hits all at once, where the small little turbos in the stealth and the extra torque make power delivery a lot smoother and less noticable then being thrown back when the 16G hits. Plus the weight difference is really noticable when driving the two back to back.
|
|
|
03-11-2005
|
#13
|
back in the saddle again
|
Re: VR4 top speed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDeutsch
The active exhaust is garbage, but everthing I've read, including first hand accounts and mitsu reports, indicates that the rear spoiler does increase downforce when it's tilted.
And yes 180 is reasonable with the right mods. I clocked a max speed of 169.6 on my stealth via GPS with the same basic mods as Swanny.
There's defintely a lot of gadgets in a 3S. Why do you think they're so heavy?
I've recently realized that I enjoy driving my 1G DSM with a 16G on the street and to work a lot more then my Stealth. And I think the reason is that a 3S doesn't feel like it's fast until you're doing triple digits (which I don't really hit in rush hour). The 3S just isolates you from the road so much better and you have a lot more confidence in the handling, it makes it a boring street car unless you're foolish enough to constantly run at twice the speed limit.
On the other hand 80mph in my 1G feels fast (a lot has to do with the crappy tires and worn out suspension). The 16G is laggy (comparitively) and hits all at once, where the small little turbos in the stealth and the extra torque make power delivery a lot smoother and less noticable then being thrown back when the 16G hits. Plus the weight difference is really noticable when driving the two back to back.
|
lol, i've noticed the same with the auto im rockin now.
It 'feels' fast cause its a lot well, less of a car when it comes to high end. Speeds actually feel 80mph when you traveling at it, instead of the 30mph it feels like in the stealth.
That car wasn't 'exciting' unless you were sliding through a corner at 2x the speed or cruising along the highway at 140+mph.
__________________
My street car runs low 11's and my race car's personal best is a mid 11....
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|