01-09-2010
|
#161
|
Pewp Champion
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Blaine
Drives: Teh Bean
Posts: 12,309
|
Re: 91 Galant VR4
Can't wait to see it man!!!
|
|
|
01-09-2010
|
#162
|
Transmission destroyer
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cambridge
Drives: G37, 91 TSi
Posts: 7,150
|
Re: 91 Galant VR4
car looked great today John!!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by scheides
I swing from the nuts of cold hard data. Anything less is a guess.
|
|
|
|
01-09-2010
|
#163
|
Built it from scratch!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: St. Paul
Drives: Currently Mitsu-less
Posts: 851
|
Re: 91 Galant VR4
This is just me being a little over critical about the manifold but don't you want the injectors pointing more at the intake valve instead of the angle that they are at?
I love the tube frame that you made!
__________________
"A turbo, exhaust gasses go into the turbocharger and spin it, witchcraft happens and you go faster."
|
|
|
01-09-2010
|
#164
|
15min late to the world
|
Re: 91 Galant VR4
the main reasons you want the injector to point right at the valve is for emissions and a low idle rpm and idle quality. The 160lb/hr injectors are the secondarys, which will only be used when needed, so idle and low rpm/vacuum the engine should run off a fairly small primary injector in the stock location. The farther up stream you place your injector, either a primary or secondary the more power the engine will make. I found testing where a 1000 horse power engine gained around 50 hp from moving the injectors 14" up stream from the valve, I think they said they started at 7". But the engine had to idle at 1700rpm. The reason I found for the more power is the fuel takes heat out of the incoming air, thus its more dense and the engine makes more power. Also they did not find injector angle to be much of a factor but anything from perpendicular to 45deg to the incoming air was good, anything more then 45 either did not change or hurt power. As far as the injectors angling in there is not enough room on the runner to have them next to each other, and I did not want a fuel starving issue, so the angle makes the space from 1 injector to the next about the same.
~John
__________________
Moon taxi: 9.45@156.9 mph 41psi 2011... Letting people down sense 2012.
Last edited by Pushit2.0; 01-09-2010 at 10:33 PM..
|
|
|
01-11-2010
|
#165
|
15min late to the world
|
Re: 91 Galant VR4
I put the rolling chassis up on the scales last night. 1720lbs, If I am around 2500lbs race weight with driver I will be happy.
~John
__________________
Moon taxi: 9.45@156.9 mph 41psi 2011... Letting people down sense 2012.
|
|
|
01-11-2010
|
#166
|
back in the saddle again
|
Re: 91 Galant VR4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pushit2.0
I put the rolling chassis up on the scales last night. 1720lbs, If I am around 2500lbs race weight with driver I will be happy.
~John
|
That is light!
__________________
My street car runs low 11's and my race car's personal best is a mid 11....
|
|
|
01-11-2010
|
#167
|
Unsure resident asshole
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MN
Drives: '92 Eagle TalonTSI w/many mods
Posts: 3,696
|
Re: 91 Galant VR4
hooly shiiiiit!
__________________
Black 1GB Mafia #1
744AWHP/526TQ-Shootout mode
639.6AWHP/452TQ-DB's dyno
I wanna go fast.
|
|
|
01-11-2010
|
#168
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Blaine, MN
Drives: '91 Automagic
Posts: 13,908
|
Re: 91 Galant VR4
WTF 1720?
Whats left thats major weight to go back in? you are crazy.
|
|
|
01-11-2010
|
#169
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Saint Paul, MN.
Drives: E36
Posts: 2,269
|
Re: 91 Galant VR4
That's insanely light, jeez. I don't feel like doing math, but I can imagine the power to weight is gonna be nuts.
|
|
|
01-11-2010
|
#170
|
Transmission destroyer
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cambridge
Drives: G37, 91 TSi
Posts: 7,150
|
Re: 91 Galant VR4
Quote:
Originally Posted by turbotalon1g
WTF 1720?
Whats left thats major weight to go back in? you are crazy.
|
The engine. lol
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by scheides
I swing from the nuts of cold hard data. Anything less is a guess.
|
|
|
|
01-12-2010
|
#171
|
15min late to the world
|
Re: 91 Galant VR4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pushit2.0
...rolling chassis... will be happy with 2500lb race weight...
|
The list of things to go back on the car is a little long but off the top of my head:
Engine, tranny, front drive shafts, transfer case, clutch, flywheel, intake and exhaust manifolds, BOV, waste gates, turbo, water to air intercooler, heat exchanger, water pump and lines, radiator, radiator fans, fuel pump, battery and battery box, alternator, front and rear bumper covers, head lights, fabricated dash and gauges, AEM EMS, MSD ignition, custom wiring harness, exhaust.
The last time the car ran it was 2800lbs with me in it, so the dyno day at DB that is what it weighed.
~John
__________________
Moon taxi: 9.45@156.9 mph 41psi 2011... Letting people down sense 2012.
|
|
|
01-12-2010
|
#172
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cottage Grove
Drives: Silver '02 IS300, Blue '06 Suzuki SV1000
Posts: 5,293
|
Re: 91 Galant VR4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin 1G Drummer
What are your plans for rear suspension? 4 link with a ford 9" or keep blowing up stock axles? haha
|
?
__________________
'02 Lexus IS300
'06 Suzuki SV1000: Back on the road and ripping hard as ever!
|
|
|
01-13-2010
|
#173
|
15min late to the world
|
Re: 91 Galant VR4
I will run the 4 bolt at first, and have a few axels on hand to swap in as needed. Then I will look at drive shaft shop stage 5 rear axels vs a solid rear axel/4 link setup the main hold back with the stock rear end is if the axel does not break the ring and pinion are next. Then when the rear end does not break the transfer case and front axels become the problem. The goal is to make the car as light as possible, make as little torque as possible, and no wheel hop what so ever, if all this happens the drive train might hold up for more then 1 pass.
~John
ps Kevin I missed your post somehow.
__________________
Moon taxi: 9.45@156.9 mph 41psi 2011... Letting people down sense 2012.
|
|
|
01-13-2010
|
#174
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cottage Grove
Drives: Silver '02 IS300, Blue '06 Suzuki SV1000
Posts: 5,293
|
Re: 91 Galant VR4
It's all good. I thought you might have, so I decided to bump it up again. Sounds like a pretty good plan.
__________________
'02 Lexus IS300
'06 Suzuki SV1000: Back on the road and ripping hard as ever!
|
|
|
01-20-2010
|
#175
|
15min late to the world
|
Re: 91 Galant VR4
I am working on the 4 slide tube mounts right now, the aluminum strips are just to hold the fenders at the right distance apart. The hood will either have 4 pins for easy removal or be mounted to the removable front end. I will drill holes threw the slide connection and add pins, the 2 up by the windshield will be removed from the top just behind the hood. And the lower 2 will be removed from under the front bumper cover.
The bigger long tube is welded to the chassis, then there is a tube that slides in, and is welded to the fender.
The removable front end will be mounted to a frame that will slide into the lower slide tube mounts.

I am also spending some time here and there to produce a few of these R.E.E.F SMIM for the 1g DSM.
~John
__________________
Moon taxi: 9.45@156.9 mph 41psi 2011... Letting people down sense 2012.
Last edited by Pushit2.0; 01-20-2010 at 02:06 AM..
|
|
|
01-20-2010
|
#176
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: edward lake
Drives: toaster
Posts: 6,431
|
Re: 91 Galant VR4
looking really good
I will have to pick up a mani for the hatch some time
|
|
|
01-21-2010
|
#177
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cottage Grove
Drives: Silver '02 IS300, Blue '06 Suzuki SV1000
Posts: 5,293
|
Re: 91 Galant VR4
How much do you plan on charging for those Manis?
__________________
'02 Lexus IS300
'06 Suzuki SV1000: Back on the road and ripping hard as ever!
|
|
|
01-21-2010
|
#178
|
15min late to the world
|
Re: 91 Galant VR4
The price is a little more then a JMF. I will be out in the garage tonight to work more on the front end.
~John
__________________
Moon taxi: 9.45@156.9 mph 41psi 2011... Letting people down sense 2012.
|
|
|
02-08-2010
|
#179
|
15min late to the world
|
Re: 91 Galant VR4
__________________
Moon taxi: 9.45@156.9 mph 41psi 2011... Letting people down sense 2012.
Last edited by Pushit2.0; 02-08-2010 at 01:22 PM..
|
|
|
02-08-2010
|
#180
|
Unsure resident asshole
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MN
Drives: '92 Eagle TalonTSI w/many mods
Posts: 3,696
|
Re: 91 Galant VR4
Why square bar, and not round stock? Didn't you have the roundstock for that lower bar before?
__________________
Black 1GB Mafia #1
744AWHP/526TQ-Shootout mode
639.6AWHP/452TQ-DB's dyno
I wanna go fast.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|