09-11-2006
|
#1
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mpls
Posts: 290
|
Bore
I'm thinking about boriing my block, What gains will there be from doing so? Would it be worth it if I don't make it a stroker?
|
|
|
09-11-2006
|
#2
|
Admin
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sportsman's Paradise, LA.
Posts: 5,382
|
Re: Bore
If you don't know the gains, I suggest you take it to somebody who does.
Boring out a block is for the soul purpose of moving up to the next size larger pistons. We do this for several reasons, scoring in the cylinder walls, seizing the piston in the block, cylinder worn too far out of round, etc.
As for stoking it, people have stroked engines on stock bores.
__________________
"You don't have a clue. You couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance."
When she get's bitchy, SPANK THAT ASS! (#Y#)
|
|
|
09-11-2006
|
#3
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mpls
Posts: 290
|
Re: Bore
So just boring my block (with the correct size pistons) won't change how my motor performs?
__________________
Thaught
|
|
|
09-11-2006
|
#4
|
Admin
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sportsman's Paradise, LA.
Posts: 5,382
|
Re: Bore
Not really, unless there is a problem with your engine that requires it.
__________________
"You don't have a clue. You couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance."
When she get's bitchy, SPANK THAT ASS! (#Y#)
|
|
|
09-11-2006
|
#5
|
11 Seconds to Freedom
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: U of M
Posts: 543
|
Re: Bore
There will be a small displacement gain but not enought to mean anything. If you are rebuilding, I would personally do it whether it really needs it or not. I would rather spend the extra couple bucks on some new pistons and a bore out just to be sure.
__________________
90 TSI AWD - A long way to go....
|
|
|
09-12-2006
|
#6
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mpls
Posts: 290
|
Re: Bore
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor06
There will be a small displacement gain but not enought to mean anything. If you are rebuilding, I would personally do it whether it really needs it or not. I would rather spend the extra couple bucks on some new pistons and a bore out just to be sure.
|
See this is my first rebuild, I bought a shell a few weeks back and i was thinking, "well if boring my cylinders will be a bit stronger, why not". I just dont want to build my motor to break.
__________________
Thaught
|
|
|
09-12-2006
|
#7
|
formerly ecoli
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On the dyno
Posts: 4,892
|
Re: Bore
Boring your cylinders makes them weaker. Going .020" over is such a small displacement gain that any horsepower gains from it would be hard to even notice. How the new rings seat will possibly have a bigger effect on how the new motor performed. If you went from stock bore to something like .080", then you might seeing some performance gains from the increase in displacement, but you can't go too far before the cylinder walls are too thin for high HP.
|
|
|
09-12-2006
|
#8
|
aka Goodbye
|
Re: Bore
If you can bottle hone it and throw the stock pistons back in with new rings, you'll be in good shape in more ways than one.
__________________
2009 Corvette Z51-SOLD
1992 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX-SOLD
2013 BMW Z4-Current summer hooptie
2017 GMC Yukon-Current winter hooptie
|
|
|
09-12-2006
|
#9
|
Kevin
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Shoreview
Posts: 3,356
|
Re: Bore
Unless the cylinder bores are f-ed up, you might as well just lightly hone the cylinders, and use the stock size pistons. And if you're considering stroking the engine (i.e. 2.3L), why not just go to a 2.4L block?
__________________
Misses the Mitsu Community
Currently on Corvette #4
|
|
|
09-12-2006
|
#10
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Downtown Minn.
Posts: 55
|
Re: Bore
Tits, if you're using the block that's sitting in the garage. Get it bored and honed, it needs it.
|
|
|
09-12-2006
|
#11
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mpls
Posts: 290
|
Re: Bore
Yea I was thinking i would any way its got a little scoring on it. .30 what do you guys think
__________________
Thaught
|
|
|
09-12-2006
|
#12
|
Crash Course Racing
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Skid Row
Drives: in circles
Posts: 2,623
|
Re: Bore
If you do any overbore do .020
__________________
What the fuck should I 4G6x swap?
|
|
|
09-13-2006
|
#13
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mpls
Posts: 290
|
Re: Bore
.20 alright
__________________
Thaught
|
|
|
09-16-2006
|
#14
|
11 Seconds to Freedom
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: U of M
Posts: 543
|
Re: Bore
Jake (EclipseGST) once told me that 2.0 blocks can go out quite a ways. 2.4 and 2.0 blocks use the same casting and the bore of the 2.0 blocks is 85mm while the 2.4 is 86mm. He says hes seen 2.4's go over .040 so you should be able to go .040 over on a 2.0 block and still be perfectly fine.
If you can get away with just honing and new rings by all means do that but I wouldnt be scared of boring the shit out if you have to especially if you only go out .020.
__________________
90 TSI AWD - A long way to go....
|
|
|
09-16-2006
|
#15
|
Reynolds number user
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: grove/tempe
Posts: 3,553
|
Re: Bore
2.0 and 2.4 blocks are certainly not the same casting. their deck heights differ by like 6mm!
__________________
07 Ducati Monster S4R
00 honda elite 50 (64 mph braH!)
05 malaguti F15
04 E55 AMG
|
|
|
09-18-2006
|
#16
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mpls
Posts: 290
|
Re: Bore
I'm just trying to build a 2.0 right now. Once my cars running I'm going to start on a stroker.
__________________
Thaught
|
|
|
09-18-2006
|
#17
|
Is funding Exxon.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ham Lake
Drives: like a bat outta hell!
Posts: 7,983
|
Re: Bore
Quote:
Originally Posted by Super Bleeder!!
2.0 and 2.4 blocks are certainly not the same casting. their deck heights differ by like 6mm!
|
And why couldn't the 2.0 just be a smaller bore and be milled down 6mm more? It's only 1/4", which is 2 passes on cast iron. Maybe 45 seconds of machine time.
__________________
Is burning corn and stayin' warm!
My motorcycle is stock and reliable, my Talon is neither!
|
|
|
09-19-2006
|
#18
|
aka Goodbye
|
Re: Bore
Quote:
Originally Posted by JET
And why couldn't the 2.0 just be a smaller bore and be milled down 6mm more? It's only 1/4", which is 2 passes on cast iron. Maybe 45 seconds of machine time.
|
It might be real similar to a NT 2.0 block, but not a turbo block. Things like oil squirters and a knock sensor hole.
If you're going to build a motor with aftermarket pistons and rods, it's not any more expensive to just build a 2.4. But I wouldn't go more than .020 on a 2.4 block, there's been more than a few cases of cracked cylinders, like Momin's. You can bore the hell out of a 2.0, .060 is not unheard of.
__________________
2009 Corvette Z51-SOLD
1992 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX-SOLD
2013 BMW Z4-Current summer hooptie
2017 GMC Yukon-Current winter hooptie
|
|
|
09-18-2006
|
#19
|
Admin
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sportsman's Paradise, LA.
Posts: 5,382
|
Re: Bore
Why build two? Build one right the first time.
__________________
"You don't have a clue. You couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance."
When she get's bitchy, SPANK THAT ASS! (#Y#)
|
|
|
09-19-2006
|
#20
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mpls
Posts: 290
|
Re: Bore
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ViciousGSX
Why build two? Build one right the first time.
|
I'd love to and am still thinking about it, but theres one problem, $$$.
__________________
Thaught
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|