PDA

View Full Version : 2.4 Dyno Numbers


Pages : 1 [2] 3

ACRucrazy
04-13-2004, 09:59 AM
Originally posted by 92tsiawd84+Apr 13 2004, 07:57 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (92tsiawd84 @ Apr 13 2004, 07:57 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Matt D.@Apr 13 2004, 08:51 AM
Why discuss something that's already been discussed?
Then why did you post it? [/b][/quote]
PWN3D

Alpine TSi
04-13-2004, 10:04 AM
QUOTE (Matt D. @ Apr 13 2004, 08:51 AM)
Why discuss something that's already been discussed?&nbsp;


Then why did you post it?

He was informing us of something going on in the DSM world. You were just reposting the same stuff we could see elsewhere, therefore wasting space and making me use the little scroll wheel on my mouse just a little more therefore decreasing its lifespan... Thanks. I don't see how people can insist on barging in others people posts. Seriously.

Matt D.
04-13-2004, 10:07 AM
Originally posted by ACRucrazy@Apr 13 2004, 07:54 AM
I see a Dodge 2.4 bottom end, stroked to bored and stroked to 2.6ish Liters, with a reverse flowing neon head in a DSM... Heh... Dimond from Mitus, Star from Chrysler Motor companys real red headed step child!

EDIT: How can the Avenger/Eclipse Head fit the Mitsu 2.4 bottom end, now im really confused. I assumed that since I see a Neon/Avenger/EclipseRS valve cover, that its a Avenger Head, and then assumed that it can only bolt on to a Dodge block, as in Neon 2.0 or Stratus 2.4... Not to the Mitsu 2.0 or 2.4..

Hrm... any ideas?
The 2.6 engine in that thread is a boosted 420A. Totally different engine than what is being discussed.

ACRucrazy
04-13-2004, 10:11 AM
Ahhh. well thanks for cleaing that up, I was very confused, cuz that head looked like a Mopar Head.

JET
04-13-2004, 10:21 AM
Hmmm...that 2.4 setup is basically the same as mine except the turbo (his is quite a bit bigger) and the intake manifold. It should be interesting! I actually hope I don't make that much torque, that is going to be hard on parts!!

Goat Blower
04-13-2004, 10:41 AM
2.4's rule.

Shane@DBPerformance
04-13-2004, 10:44 AM
Thats some pretty good numbers. Kinda low trap for 600awhp considering Nash is close to 130mph with 100fwhp less. I wonder how the stock tranny is liking all that torque and power. :) Not the quickest spooling thing in the world, but not terrible. Nash's 61mm on his little 2.0 is spooling faster than that 63 on the 2.4, especially considering the 2.4 is on an AWD dyno. The 2.4 is dropping power after 6500RPMs. That seems to be a reoccuring problem on a lot of the decent power 2.4 dynos that I have seen. On a 2.0 the same extensive list of parts would probably not start dropping power until past 8000+RPMs.

JET
04-13-2004, 10:46 AM
What do you think that could be? Head flow? Cams? I am guessing exhaust manifold, but it's only a guess.

SlowWhite
04-13-2004, 10:48 AM
I think those 132mph traps are from his old set up.

On Dsmtunes he said he can't wait to take it to the track this year to see what she'll run. Which implies he hasn't tested it yet.

-brian

Pushit2.0
04-13-2004, 10:53 AM
Ither their is way to much displacement and not enough flow threw the head made for 2liters, or he is loosing power due to tunning with the AEM. If you are afraid to step outside the box and try new things, the ems is for sure not for you, unless you have thousands of dollars to pay someone else to set it up and tune it for you. I wounder why they let off at 35psi? thats when things start to happen.

~John