Dave's Evo X Build/The Life of Dave blog - Page 123

**Murlo26** · 02-01-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shane@DBPerformance

You can get a 6266 or 6766 for half the cost of a 6466, so it's probably not going to be that commonly used.

Really?

The 6466 is actually more than both those by double? Or do you mean a lot of people are selling them used for cheap or something? Just confused how the other turbos can be so much cheaper? I am guessing they are all about the same cost to produce.

**4seasons69** · 02-01-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by Murlo26

Really?

The 6466 is actually more than both those by double? Or do you mean a lot of people are selling them used for cheap or something? Just confused how the other turbos can be so much cheaper? I am guessing they are all about the same cost to produce.

on pte's website a 6466 is 1909.99, a 6766 is 1199.99 and a 6266 is 999.99 so the 6466 is just normally quite a bit more

**scheides** · 02-01-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by turbotalon1g

That is awesome, I say do it.
Is there anyone local making good power on a 6466? I haven't seen one outpower a 6266.

There's a guy named Troy on evomn (and here) that had a 6266 fail, when it came back it was a 6466. The car made like 40whp more and spooled about 200rpm later. Pretty sweet

evotuner · 02-01-2013

i like the 6466 idea lol

although your ef4 is probably pretty nasty

turbotalon1g · 02-01-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by scheides

There's a guy named Troy on evomn (and here) that had a 6266 fail, when it came back it was a 6466. The car made like 40whp more and spooled about 200rpm later. Pretty sweet

Same boost levels?

**Halon** · 02-01-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by scheides

There's a guy...that had a 6266 fail

That's wierd...

**goodhart** · 02-01-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halon

That's wierd...

2 of them actually. One lasted about 5 minutes of idling, the other about 500 miles of break in and >10 psi.

http://www.evomn.net/forums/showthre...466-comparison

MorningWood · 02-02-2013

Me and Josh are both making good power on the 6466's. My car still had a stock intake manifold, throttle body, and no porting on the head, it made 709whp at 38psi on RS's Mustang Dyno. Josh Made over 700 on Buschur's Mustang Dyno.

The reason the 6466's cost so much more is they only come in Ball Bearing, you can get the 62 and 67 in Journal Bearings hence the lower price on the site, when you get up to the Ball Bearing option for those turbo's they close in on price with the 64.

My 64 actually spooled the same as my 62 did, at 35psi it didnt really make much more power. but the 6266 quit making power on my set up at that level (615whp on Ron's Dyno) the 6466 started picking up good power around there so it must have been right in its efficiency range, I ended up being able to make 665whp with 39psi, then it slowed down on making power until I went from kelford 272's to GSC s3's where it made 709whp at 38psi

bramagedained · 02-02-2013

My car is at DB getting the fuel system changed some and setup on E98 so we'll see what kind of power it will make all in. Though my stock ported TB and IM will probably turn into a restriction, maybe the M2 cams too, but, none of that is going to get changed.

The 711 at buschur/773 at MAP my car made was done with a tune setup for E70(that was 5 months old at the tme) too.

turbotalon1g · 02-02-2013

Vassil made 745 on a DSM at DB at 35psi, that is why I ask and there are a few DSMs in that 700-750 range without going over 40psi.

That is the only reason I say that, I have heard that the 6466 and 6766 spool damn near the 6266 in a lot of cases though.

**Murlo26** · 02-02-2013

Sorry to get off the whole 6466 topic

Maybe I should've made its own thread, didn't think it would generate enough talk.

Anyway, new parts! Trying to solve my whole crank case pressure deal, this should do it. At the track my oil cap came off, not sure if its from the fact it might be a shitty design or just crank case pressure pushing it off, so I didn't want to risk it and bought these. New oil cap (lost mine) and new catch can with 10AN lines and light weight matching bracket on the other side of the bumper.

Here is an example of it installed:

I'll take more pictures this spring when I put it in with my new fuel rail and new injectors.

turbotalon1g · 02-02-2013

If a DSM cap is the same style and fits on your car, you are welcome to try my -10AN oil cap.

**Murlo26** · 02-02-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by turbotalon1g

If a DSM cap is the same style and fits on your car, you are welcome to try my -10AN oil cap.

I don't think I'd need that. I assume that is to connect to a catch can? My valve cover has 2 ports already.

**Halon** · 02-02-2013

What's that 2nd bracket for?

**scheides** · 02-02-2013

Looks like it actually replaces the mount for the front crash beam. No wonder it's so beefy

**Murlo26** · 02-02-2013

I'll show pictures later, the second bracket is the mirror image, just not a catch can on the other side, weight savings basically.

turbotalon1g · 02-03-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by Murlo26

I don't think I'd need that. I assume that is to connect to a catch can? My valve cover has 2 ports already.

Yes it would need to be connected to some kind of catch can, well I'm getting rid of it and I didn't know if you wanted more ports.

**Murlo26** · 02-03-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halon

What's that 2nd bracket for?

Quote:

Originally Posted by scheides

Looks like it actually replaces the mount for the front crash beam. No wonder it's so beefy

Here are a few more pics, its part of the front crash beam like Scheides said I believe.

Quote:

Originally Posted by turbotalon1g

Yes it would need to be connected to some kind of catch can, well I'm getting rid of it and I didn't know if you wanted more ports.

Yea I don't think I will need any more ports, thanks though man

**scheides** · 02-03-2013

So are there any provisions for providing vacuum to the oil can?

Also how on earth is that 'easy access' for draining? I guess if you have no undertray?

**Murlo26** · 02-04-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by scheides

So are there any provisions for providing vacuum to the oil can?

Also how on earth is that 'easy access' for draining? I guess if you have no undertray?

No provisions for vacuum on this. And its just as easy/hard as my current catch can setup, which sucks to drain lol. My current one I have to basically take my bumper off to do. This I think you can pull the undertray and drain, maybe 20 mins of dinking around, not so bad.