MitsuStyle MitsuStyle

Go Back   MitsuStyle > Hosted Support Forums > Primo Performance

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-08-2010   #21
daneatsv8s
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: St. Paul
Drives: 91 Galant VR4, 97 Eclipse GSX, 91 Talon TSI
Posts: 139
Re: Evo X 3.5" Intake

Just fyi, the MAP website has been updated with new pictures and a description of the EVO X intake. We will be posting up an official thread for the intake with a full description shortly.

http://www.maperformance.com/primo-p...-evox-aik.html
daneatsv8s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2010   #22
mlomker
*Resting In Peace*
 
mlomker's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Heaven
Drives: 94 Plymouth Acclaim/2008 EvoX
Posts: 2,430
Re: Evo X 3.5" Intake

A 3" MAF maxes around 500 Dynojet, maybe upper 400's. The stock housing is certainly down there.

It'll be interesting to see where Hollywood's MAF voltages end up since he's doing a stroker build.
__________________
Modlist / Dyno Graphs / Facebook

kracka--It's official, Lomker sucks at chicks!
mlomker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2010   #23
Murlo26
 
Murlo26's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lino Lakes
Drives: 17 Honda Accord
Posts: 4,041
Re: Evo X 3.5" Intake

At 570whp (DJ numbers) mine was hitting I think mid 4.7 V's at most. I think 600whp area is doable, I'd say 620ish will be the max. I am hoping to get to around 620ish with manifold work.

Just checked, I hit 4.73V at 8700rpm around 30psi (like 29.8 or something).

So still have some room, that was on my 37psi tune.

Last edited by Murlo26; 11-08-2010 at 10:37 AM..
Murlo26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2010   #24
blageo23
AWD4G64
 
blageo23's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Shoreview, MN
Posts: 2,286
Send a message via AIM to blageo23
Re: Evo X 3.5" Intake

Quote:
Originally Posted by mlomker View Post
A 3" MAF maxes around 500 Dynojet, maybe upper 400's. The stock housing is certainly down there.

It'll be interesting to see where Hollywood's MAF voltages end up since he's doing a stroker build.
We were referring to Dyno Dynamics numbers. I talked to Shane and he gave us some information on his experience tuning Evo Xs
__________________
1998 Spyder AWD
567hp
490tq
blageo23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2010   #25
Murlo26
 
Murlo26's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lino Lakes
Drives: 17 Honda Accord
Posts: 4,041
Re: Evo X 3.5" Intake

Quote:
Originally Posted by blageo23 View Post
We were referring to Dyno Dynamics numbers. I talked to Shane and he gave us some information on his experience tuning Evo Xs

No, but typically for national forums and something like this Lomker and i have learned to talk in dynojet numbers otherwise people get confused, lol.

Very few people know how low a dyno dynamics reads.
Murlo26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2010   #26
scheides
flips McGee
 
scheides's Avatar
Re: Evo X 3.5" Intake

Yea I would make sure the numbers listed also specify the dyno those numbers are from, basically just say should support 630whp (dynojet), 550whp (dyno dynamics).

I want one of these! The price is very nice.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26 View Post
I need to listen to Scheides more often i think :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by turbotalon1g View Post
...I realized that I can't keep up my shit talking without anything to back it up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JV
S2000: For those of us that know the Miata is the best car on the planet, but also want extra power and to not have to turn in our man cards.
scheides is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2010   #27
Murlo26
 
Murlo26's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lino Lakes
Drives: 17 Honda Accord
Posts: 4,041
Re: Evo X 3.5" Intake

Quote:
Originally Posted by scheides View Post
Yea I would make sure the numbers listed also specify the dyno those numbers are from, basically just say should support 630whp (dynojet), 550whp (dyno dynamics).

I want one of these! The price is very nice.
Using just division to find a constant to represent whp vs. MAF voltage I come up with like 603whp for 5v...

I really doubt that it is linear like that and using a single point on one log isn't a great way to do it, but I guess what I am trying to say is 630whp could be a bit much. I think just saying 600whp+ would be wiser so you don't get some noob blaming them for not being able to make more than 600whp
Murlo26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.