Official 2005 Challenge Thread - Page 11

dumb_ricer · 01-30-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by 93BoostedAcclude

Now that is probably the best news i've heard all week. That YOU think i'm going to be running a 60-1 hahahhaha. That turbo is fucking tiny, and so is your 61mm lol. you think your going to make 600whp on a 61?? haha in your dreams. your gonna need some nitrous for that. And my turbo flows 10lbs more than yours does and my exhaust wheel is 3 inches big.....how big is your stage 5 wheel haha. Figure out what turbo i'm running yet??

Something thatll run 11.5@145mph even with slicks? Thats my guess.

slowHonduh · 01-31-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by dumb_ricer

Something thatll run 11.5@145mph even with slicks? Thats my guess.

another hint: 3 people on this forum run them. hmmm what could it be??

niterydr · 01-31-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by 93BoostedAcclude

another hint: 3 people on this forum run them. hmmm what could it be??

I know what it is, lol..

Do you want to race a stealth when your car is done (of course mine would be done as well)?

Matt D. · 01-31-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by 93BoostedAcclude

another hint: 3 people on this forum run them. hmmm what could it be??

You mean 5.

A//// Guy · 01-30-2005

No one cares, well see you at the track.

He never claimed he was going to make 600hp anyway... geez can you read?

john · 01-31-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by EclipseTurbo

He never claimed he was going to make 600hp anyway... geez can you read?

The real question is can you read. Look back when I showed the link to what he was saying accross the internet on the attack forums. Said he should have a 600whp dsm (actually should be closer to 650).

**JET** · 01-31-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carlos

The real question is can you read. Look back when I showed the link to what he was saying accross the internet on the attack forums. Said he should have a 600whp dsm (actually should be closer to 650).

Yes, the operative word is "should". Get a dictionary!

santa · 01-31-2005

Once again were not 3 we dont need to "guess" what you have.. Just tell us if your hinting.

Kevin

john · 01-31-2005

Nobody can keep a secret these days... I know and haven't even told my brother. Hell, I deleted it out of my Pms so nobody could "snoop" and find the answer.

slowbubblecar · 01-31-2005

most likely. We'll see if my car lasts longer than yours did first. You biger than a gt35? Doesn't matter if you are or not.

**JET** · 01-31-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by ghettostyle

most likely. We'll see if my car lasts longer than yours did first. You biger than a gt35? Doesn't matter if you are or not.

Nope, just a little SCM61.

A//// Guy · 01-31-2005

Pick a time and place cuz I want this on video

john · 01-31-2005

never mind

slowbubblecar · 01-31-2005

It will have to be in the spring when both of our cars run. We will defenitly have to get it on video. I will have to see if I can get a new charger for my camcorder.

At-Least-It's-An-Evo · 01-31-2005

Gimme 1.5 seasons of "down-time", then I'll race everyone AND their mom.

vassil · 01-31-2005

My Turn. As with most DSMs, mine is not running now but it will before it gets warm.
Mine is a 2L with a 52lbs turbo for those who don't know. I would like to challenge Steve since we ran the same time at slippery rock and most of all because I bought my car from him, and I would like to challenge JET for HP/Liter (I know that may sound gay, but my car is heavy, my turbo is smaller and my engine is not stroked).

**JET** · 01-31-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by vassil

I would like to challenge JET for HP/Liter (I know that may sound gay, but my car is heavy, my turbo is smaller and my engine is not stroked).

Sure, I'll use my motorcycle

2.4's don't really do much of anything for HP. They spin the turbo up sooner and make the bigger turbo's more streetable. That is really about the only difference from what I have found. There is probably a small difference in HP, but not much. For the most part bore = HP, the bore on the 2.4 isn't much bigger than a 2.0 (which could be bored out equal to a 2.4).

At-Least-It's-An-Evo · 01-31-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by JET

Sure, I'll use my motorcycle

2.4's don't really do much of anything for HP. They spin the turbo up sooner and make the bigger turbo's more streetable. That is really about the only difference from what I have found. There is probably a small difference in HP, but not much. For the most part bore = HP, the bore on the 2.4 isn't much bigger than a 2.0 (which could be bored out equal to a 2.4).

If he makes over 500 whp, it'd be a good run against a 750cc bike. With a fast spooling turbo like his, it'd probably trap 128-129 which is a little bit more than enough to beat/slowly pull a 750 imho. I get this from Shaun and I both having raced bikes, anywhere from 600-1000cc and we both trapped low 130. We hung, if not, pulled away from new R1's.

santa · 02-01-2005

Sorry I don't mean to jump into the middle of this but... Jet didn't you state this??.(directly from attack forums thread..copy and pasted)

Kevin, you don't need to go there again. He has already explained this numerous times. It has already been discussed in this thread and it also has its own thread in the parking lot. I don't care what he said exactly, he meant to say what his setup was capable of. If you want to know more about his comment on the attack forums you can PM him.

CRAIG

Pushit2.0 · 02-01-2005

I can do $500 a race. Jet, Nash.

~John