1959 Chevrolet Bel Air Vs. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu

[ctruss53]

I think it probably has to do with how narrow the frame is in the front of the Bel Air. If you think about it most of what the Malibou hit was just inner and outer fender sheet metal and the front suspension.

The wonders of unibody construction.

[123abc]

Originally Posted by ctruss53

I think it probably has to do with how narrow the frame is in the front of the Bel Air. If you think about it most of what the Malibou hit was just inner and outer fender sheet metal and the front suspension.

The wonders of unibody construction.

That is a very good point. Since the bodies were not meant to take most of the weight and stress, and the frame being narrow, the unibody has a much better chance at that sort of crash.

It would be very interesting to see the same test performed with a 60's vehicle with unibody construction.

[FattyBoomBatty]

Originally Posted by ctruss53

I think it probably has to do with how narrow the frame is in the front of the Bel Air. If you think about it most of what the Malibou hit was just inner and outer fender sheet metal and the front suspension.

The wonders of unibody construction.

Doesn't matter. The video isn't about 60's cars, it's about a car that was new when the standards were first instituted.


Did you see the 50 years worth of dust and shit that flew off the bel air upon impact? Also, I bet the bel air internet forums are up in arms about this.

[ctruss53]

Originally Posted by FattyBoomBatty

Doesn't matter. The video isn't about 60's cars, it's about a car that was new when the standards were first instituted.


Did you see the 50 years worth of dust and shit that flew off the bel air upon impact? Also, I bet the bel air internet forums are up in arms about this.

All I am doing is pointing out why the huge old car crumpled like it did. I never meant to justify it's behavior in the crash.

thx

[Kevin 1G Drummer]

Originally Posted by ctruss53

I think it probably has to do with how narrow the frame is in the front of the Bel Air. If you think about it most of what the Malibou hit was just inner and outer fender sheet metal and the front suspension.

The wonders of unibody construction.

There was actually quite a bit of frame damage to the Bel Air. The front bumper is practically into the firewall on the driver's side, and the left front corner is about where the middle of the engine bay was, You can't tell me the frame didn't take the majority of the stress there. Hell, the passenger side windshield post was buckled at almost a 45 degree angle. That kind of damage wouldn't happen if all the Malibu hit was sheet metal and suspension.

[1QUICK4]

Seat belts weren't manditory until the mid 60's. Old cars were certain death.


The term they don't make them like they used to is reffering to the the fact that they were made out of metal. (no plastic inside or outside)
Plus you could actually repair a minor collision instead of scrapping the car because of the crumple zones.

And they had style, people actually wanted to by them








I'd like to see that test again with a direct front hit instead of offset