MitsuStyle - View Single Post

**Shane@DBPerformance** · 01-10-2005

The EVO 3 16G is very good, the 18G isn't. The next step up from the EVO 16G would be a 20G, the 18g would be a downgrade. There are a thousands of different T3/T4 combo possibilties, so saying T3/T4 is about as generic as saying Turbo. A T3/T4 might be anything from something about the same size as what you have now, to something that would be laggy on a Supra. You can do a Mitsu bolt-on versions of a lot of the T3/T4s, that would save some of the work and parts that are required to do a real T3/T4.

01-10-2005	#5
Shane@DBPerformance formerly ecoli Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: On the dyno Posts: 4,892	Re: Comparing the Turbos The EVO 3 16G is very good, the 18G isn't. The next step up from the EVO 16G would be a 20G, the 18g would be a downgrade. There are a thousands of different T3/T4 combo possibilties, so saying T3/T4 is about as generic as saying Turbo. A T3/T4 might be anything from something about the same size as what you have now, to something that would be laggy on a Supra. You can do a Mitsu bolt-on versions of a lot of the T3/T4s, that would save some of the work and parts that are required to do a real T3/T4. __________________ www.dbptuning.com