View Single Post
Old 04-29-2007   #10
dumb_ricer
Hates Everything
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Drives: Neon
Posts: 445
Send a message via AIM to dumb_ricer
Re: 709whp from Modern Automotive Performance!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ecoli View Post
Why port the head that much if it is going to kill the torque/low end power and still take 38psi to reach 700whp with a huge turbo?



Don't put too much faith in those classes, the tuning theory they teach works great for 1 cylinder engines or engines with a huge window between max power and detonation(like a normal compression all-motor engine), but isn't realistic for high strung boosted cars with 4+ cylinders.
Why port the head that much? No reason really. Trying something "new" for the most part. The fact that it holds power for so long I kind of like though! Maybe we'll do some tests in the future on our staged heads and see what the difference is. Until then, I think our goal is just going to be getting it to hook on the dyno, making a clean pull up to 8500, and then getting it to hook on the track, and hope for a 9.xx @ 14x.

As for putting faith in those classes, trust me, they will just be a first baby step into something I already know a lot about, but haven't actually done. I know fuel tuning extremely well, I understand combustion theory completely, and I like to think I understand timing under boost. My problems lie in things like base maps and low throttle tuning. I would have no problem setting up a base fuel map for an engine, but I don't think I would be comfortable with a base timing map. I know how the old carberated vehicles did it with vacuum advance and I see how the timing curve ramps up with RPM, but I don't know what a modern EFI with a much more efficient combustion chamber and high power should be doing. Time and experience will probably teach me pretty quickly, but until then I will stay away from any timing maps on turbocharged vehicles.
__________________
420A > LS1 > All Else
Superchargers > Nitrous > Turbochargers
I > All else
dumb_ricer is offline   Reply With Quote