Log in

View Full Version : Got my appointment...


Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5

tpunx99GSX
10-12-2005, 07:47 PM
Mind you i will be running 16-20psi

tpunx99GSX
10-12-2005, 07:56 PM
Im hoping for ~250 after the tune.

1ViciousGSX
10-12-2005, 08:15 PM
Mind you i will be running 16-20psiI stand corrected, 189 whp.

tpunx99GSX
10-12-2005, 08:22 PM
LOL, no stop saying that or you will jinx me. "Ive got hiiiigh hopes, we got hiiiiigh hopes, we got high apple pie in the Skyyyy hopes"

Shane@DBPerformance
10-12-2005, 08:26 PM
The stock 450s might have been good enough.

Around -30% will work fine for the low throttle and idle, but in the high throttle settings you usually have to go a lot farther negative. If it doesn't flow much air, though then you might be fine. On a bigger turbo with 660-680s on a 2G you often enough up being in the -42% to -50% range on the AFC. The main drawback to going so far negative on the AFC is that it puts the ECU into the wrong airflow maps and often trys to run too much timing, which results in knock. 2Gs don't run nearly as much timing as a 1G, so that might help a little, and without a DSMLink to see if it's knocking or not you won't know how much it is retarding timing, so you can instead just pretend it's fine. :) It should run fine though, I hope you have a FMIC for that much boost.

rk4g63
10-12-2005, 08:41 PM
why not just get an eprom ecu and socket and chip it?

tpunx99GSX
10-12-2005, 08:42 PM
The stock 450s might have been good enough.

Around -30% will work fine for the low throttle and idle, but in the high throttle settings you usually have to go a lot farther negative. If it doesn't flow much air, though then you might be fine. On a bigger turbo with 660-680s on a 2G you often enough up being in the -42% to -50% range on the AFC. The main drawback to going so far negative on the AFC is that it puts the ECU into the wrong airflow maps and often trys to run too much timing, which results in knock. 2Gs don't run nearly as much timing as a 1G, so that might help a little, and without a DSMLink to see if it's knocking or not you won't know how much it is retarding timing, so you can instead just pretend it's fine. :) It should run fine though, I hope you have a FMIC for that much boost.
Thanks for the info. So your saying if i got the 680s it would in effect be fine, just a lot of negatives. But if i got the 550s that would put me less negative correct?
I have a FMIC, its just not installed or piped up on the car yet, would that work. LOL Ive run 16-20 on a daily for the past 8 months without hitting any fuel cut, but we will see i guess. LOL
The shop im going to said that Cams might help out as well, but i dunno...

1ViciousGSX
10-12-2005, 08:46 PM
Thanks for the info. So your saying if i got the 680s it would in effect be fine, just a lot of negatives. But if i got the 550s that would put me less negative correct?
I have a FMIC, its just not installed or piped up on the car yet, would that work. LOL Ive run 16-20 on a daily for the past 8 months without hitting any fuel cut, but we will see i guess. LOL
The shop im going to said that Cams might help out as well, but i dunno...Put the intercooler on it before the dyno, why wait?

Jakey
10-12-2005, 08:51 PM
What shop is your car going to?

niterydr
10-12-2005, 09:17 PM
argg...
We are telling you tom, that with the 680's on a t-slightly to small, the car is going to run like ASS and make shit for power. Either resize your injectors, wait until the larger turbo, and find something else to tune with. See what they can do with your factory injectors and the fmic, keep the 680's out of there.