PDA

View Full Version : Mustang GT???


Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5

SuperSleeper
11-15-2004, 10:19 PM
"Ohh yeah and 02's don't have 5.0's they have 4.6's"

Good point, my bad.

I'm dumb... ignore me. :o

john
11-15-2004, 10:28 PM
huh?

SpicyOrange
11-15-2004, 10:29 PM
Haha..I totally forgot about that, too. Hmm...I'm just curious. Would a '96 or '95 GT be quicker than a '02 GT? I work with a guy who's got a '96 or '95 GT and I've only sort of raced him. Didnt really got at it until he was like 5 cars away then I decided to go at it...only time I raced him was the only time I wasnt thinking!

Well I know a 96 gt is a pooch, I think those were the slowest of the modern Gt's. The 95 is still the 5.0 (last year) I bet both of these years have trouble gettin in to the 14's bone stock.

1QUICK4
11-15-2004, 10:57 PM
umm, 02 stangs w/ autos can run low 14's stock. Not sure where you are getting 15 seconds from.

Maybe powerbraking the stock torqueconverter to death and slapping on some DRs

Do you know someone who has run a low 14 in their 02 GT? Because if you do thats cool. I'm just going by what I've seen at the tracks. My buddies Cobra (Not an 03) only runs 13.6s and its slightly modded and deffinetly not an auto .

A//// Guy
11-15-2004, 10:59 PM
Its 2.0 liters per all cylinders... not each cylinder, so therefore, total displacement is a little under half of a V8 4.6...

Goat Blower
11-15-2004, 11:07 PM
"Ohh yeah and 02's don't have 5.0's they have 4.6's"

Good point, my bad.

"1/5th??? if 1slowdsm has a 2.0 then that would mean the mustang would have a 10.0 liter. LOL"

Tom, your logic fails once again. Overall displacement... If we were talking 5.0 liters... it's per cylinder. 5 liters x 8 cylinders= 40. 2 liters x 4 cylinders = 8. 8/40 = 1/5.

You said "overall displacement", not "individual cylinder displacement multiplied by number of cylinders". And each cylinder is not 5 liters or even 2 liters, that's the total displacement. I've never agreed with Tom til now.

SuperSleeper
11-16-2004, 12:52 AM
Well then I have been misinformed for some time. :(

1slowdsm
11-16-2004, 06:19 AM
Supposely the GT has a few less horses than a Bullitt and there was this Bullitt that ran 14.1 at the track the last time I was there. I dont know is that was one of his good runs or not. Then there was this yellow GT that ran 13.9 and I dont know if that one was stock either, I only talked to him for like 30 seconds.

JDM
11-16-2004, 08:00 AM
I raced an 02' Auto GT Mustang and lost by about 6 inches, and I had Joe H (Rollin Joe), a sub box, and the sunroof open. This guy was a tool box. I run 15.0@93. My ex girlfriend had an 02 V6, and it ran high 15's, low 16's.

My uncle Fred in California has a black Bullitt. The thing is good for mid to low 13's with light modding (basic bolt on's).

finch63tsi
11-16-2004, 11:00 AM
well well well, lets talk about this i have beat every mustang but a cobra that is stock,
if this kid thinks that he is going to beat you he is wrong tell him to race about a block your all wheel drive will take him off the line and you will beat him easy.

i have seen 02 mustang gt (stock) auto's run from 15.4-14.8 at rock falls and 02 gt 5 speeds run 15.0-14.6

give it a try if he beats you put on some parts and then beat the shit out of him..