Log in

View Full Version : New HP record for Evo X - PT7675

Pages : 1 2 [3]
dogwhistle
07-08-2014, 06:14 PM
Dang that's awesome. Glad to see the brand still keeping up with all the super car level powers or at least without being too many bank accounts deep.
scheides
07-08-2014, 10:17 PM
Its funny you say '44psi' but the dyno graph shows 48.79. Yeow that is a freaking lot of boost!

Hard to argue with numbers, 147mph is freaking smoking for an X. Haven't seen the build but nice to see someone following through and pushing the limits, been a while!
Murlo26
07-08-2014, 10:21 PM
Its funny you say '44psi' but the dyno graph shows 48.79. Yeow that is a freaking lot of boost!

Hard to argue with numbers, 147mph is freaking smoking for an X. Haven't seen the build but nice to see someone following through and pushing the limits, been a while!

Moore Automotive said in their post, actually on evoxforums, that it was only running 44psi, not what the dyno shows. Apparently their dyno MAP isn't scaled right or something. Not sure if they are telling the truth or not, so dunno, just going off what the dyno operator said.

The 147mph was the last time out I think at the 980whp or whatever, so another 40-50whp should help some.

Going to be tough to keep up with the puerto ricans though. They just broke the 1/4 time again with like 9.2 or 9.3 at 153 i think.
niterydr
07-11-2014, 10:43 AM
Dyno map isn't scaled right and overboosts at the track? Sounds fishy. Once they learn to operate and configure a dyno the results can be trusted; otherwise it is just a graph.

Get it to the track, car should go well into the 150's for mph unless its 4000lbs.
Murlo26
07-14-2014, 12:53 PM
It's a dynojet, the results are what they are...

here is an engine bay picture:

http://www.maperformance.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/1000whp-evo-x.jpg
cmspaz
07-15-2014, 11:34 AM
Wow, that's crammed in there... Safely? I hope things are more rerouted than they look...
Murlo26
07-15-2014, 11:36 AM
Wow, that's crammed in there... Safely? I hope things are more rerouted than they look...

I think it looks like shit too lol. Looks like they at least moved the ECU, but that engine bay is a mess. I would've just stuck with a 6766 or something and done the top mount thing. You can fit a big ass turbo back there. The sidewinder stuff just seems like a ton of nonsense. Also, the heat that the turbo generates there I am surprised it hasn't melted more stuff.