Log in

View Full Version : Back at it


Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

blackawdtsi
06-14-2011, 04:31 PM
After a LONG break, and a lot of connecting the dots; I am back into DSMs.

Sunday afternoon I traded my R6 for Jungy's 2g. It's a great car, a little rough on the edges, but a great car. The motor feels strong and well put together but I still haven't gotten around to a compression test. Haven't boost leak tested or anything else.

So far all I've done is get an alignment. It was way off. And tune the car. It's running corn but was at 14:1 on 26psi... A little hot for my taste so I brought it back down to 12:1. I have to give credit to Jungy or whoever tuned the car, all I had to do was move the sliders evenly and the AFR stayed consistent.

Before I post the dyno numbers (I did one pull at Full Blown), I want to thank Brendon (Jungy) for a great build. There's not much I have to do except main upgrades. Turbo, IC, Trans. I love this car already and it's hard to not get on the gas.

Here's the dyno sheet. 26psi / T3 HX40 / E85

http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj48/twoo662/2g/451hp.jpg

I had originally planned to 6262 it right away, but I really like the HX40. Sounds like a jet engine (never had that on my 67) and has a broad powerband. Another thing I never had on the 67.

Not really too sure where to go with it. Will be putting K Sports in for sure as well as a twin disc and trans. That's the plan for now.

scheides
06-14-2011, 04:35 PM
Nice! Out of the box and great powerband and peak numbers with just some tuning. Bring it up to BIR next weekend? :)

goodhart
06-14-2011, 05:42 PM
Awesome. I've been dying to see some number from this thing!

Keep the HX40, that thing has a lot left in it. I say skip the FMIC (I thought it had a pretty good sized one already?) and clutch too and spend that money on a paint job. :D

blackawdtsi
06-14-2011, 05:48 PM
Haven't decided whether or not to try and drive it up to Proving Grounds. I'm not sure if I'd want to try driving it two hours away yet. Though Jungy did to meet me in Rogers so maybe.

The FMIC is a good one, but I have a feeling it would run out of steam 30psi+ same with the ACT 2600. I do agree that it needs some paint though, maybe a 2GB conversion first?

GsXtUrBo98
06-14-2011, 06:01 PM
^ 2600 with a 6 puck held strong on sleepydsms talon and be made good power.

blackawdtsi
06-14-2011, 06:14 PM
^ 2600 with a 6 puck held strong on sleepydsms talon and be made good power.

That's a good budget option. But I'm not interested in all the weight and harsh engagement. I know a few tricks for making the engagement less harsh but I'd rather do it right the first time. I ran a Quarter Master TD for about three months before my accident. I loved it, easy engagement, held everything and was very predictable. With the sintered iron discs I still don't think anyone's found the power limit. Might start looking at Exedy but I'm not sure they're worth the price difference.

GG_9_SE
06-14-2011, 06:41 PM
A QM twin disk with easy engagment? That's almost impossible to believe. The only QM TD I've driven was on a subie, but it was rediculously hard to drive.

blackawdtsi
06-14-2011, 06:43 PM
A QM twin disk with easy engagment? That's almost impossible to believe. The only QM TD I've driven was on a subie, but it was rediculously hard to drive.

I didn't mean ACT2100 type engagement, I meant less than 4/6 puck, sorry. But it was really easy to drive. Even my wife drove it a few times without clutch problems on 280 cams.

GG_9_SE
06-14-2011, 06:54 PM
I didn't mean ACT2100 type engagement, I meant less than 4/6 puck, sorry. But it was really easy to drive. Even my wife drove it a few times without clutch problems on 280 cams.

Wow that's pretty awesome. I thought my act 6-puck was really easy/ non harsh engagment. But if the QM for a dsm is good, then there is really no beating that. You won't ever have to replace it haha.

turbotalon1g
06-14-2011, 08:00 PM
lol, welcome back.

Love all the advice in here. I'd like to see what you can get out of that hX40, they wake up after 30psi