MAP's 2008 Evolution X GSR Build Thread aka Project GGX

[mlomker]

Still trying to figure out how the hell it made that power stock, lol.

We'll have to wait and hear if it is stock. My car hit 280 with bolt-ons and no tune. If boost is bumped or there's at least an intake/cat delete then it's quite possible.

http://photos-c.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs209.snc1/7629_1219944371477_1014940295_30721098_5311736_n.j pg

[Goat Blower]

It's right in the first chart. It looks like it hits 20psi by 4000rpm and falls to about 15psi. I'm not sure what they run stock.

[mlomker]

I'm not sure what they run stock.

I think it is 21-22 so close enough.

[niterydr]

Guys, how many times do we need to go over this? Dyno numbers are just that, numbers. What is important is the gains they will see based off this baseline. Who really cares what a stock car puts down, as long as it is a solid baseline, they are building a foundation to document x% power increase with X mod.

[Kracka]

I think it is 21-22 so close enough.
Yup. I've seen stock 2010's do 23psig on the dyno, but I'm sure a lot of that depends on loading so "only" 20psig on a DynoJet doesn't surprise me.

Solid numbers though. MAP - have you baselined any other 100% stock X's?

[A//// Guy]

Guys, how many times do we need to go over this? Dyno numbers are just that, numbers. What is important is the gains they will see based off this baseline. Who really cares what a stock car puts down, as long as it is a solid baseline, they are building a foundation to document x% power increase with X mod.

Every car must be the same though! Numbers should be exact from stock car to stock car, if they are not, we must decipher why these minuscule differences are happening. :)

[goodhart]

Every car must be the same though! Numbers should be exact from stock car to stock car, if they are not, we must decipher why these minuscule differences are happening. :)

Must be a .0035729mm variance in throttle body diameter huh? lol

[Murlo26]

Well several of us have seen dozens of stock X's on dynojets. We aren't saying anything about the numbers except they are higher than a normal X on a dynojet stock.

It's either a freak or he has a mod unknown to him because of the fact its used.

It's on 91 too which is weird. As Chris stated on EvoM it would be beneficial for it to read lower to show better gains after putting MAP parts on there.

I like how people around here get butthurt because we are curious about something...

[munchgsx]

Bone stock and running richer then 10:1.

[Halon]

What correction factor was used? I don't see it on the MAP dyno sheet. Mlomker you can see used the SAE correction factor.