View Full Version : Fancy Fuel System Questions
sleepydsm
01-12-2010, 12:04 PM
Ok, so I have been planning on going to a twin walbro setup.
Is the stock fuel line really even a limiting factor?
Twin pumps ran in parallel on all the time, will that overrun an aftermarket Aeromotive AFPR?
Are there any other problems from using a twin pump on all the time?
Is the factory return line adequate?
I can't seem to find 1/2" (-8AN) hardline for fuel anywhere. I have read it's kinda bad to run SS line all the way from tank to front of the car, for reliability, as the it is hose and will eventually collapse, etc.
My thoughts were: 2 walbros, -6 bulkhead fittings, then a y block into -8 all the way to a new filter and the rail. -6 return.
Swifty1638
01-12-2010, 12:15 PM
kevin, come over and check out my car if you want. My car is twin 310 wallys, run in parallel, through the same setup, to the rail, then -6 to the ported aeromotive FPR (was on josh's stealth back in the day for his 3-pump setup) and then into the stock return. Only issue I had with this, is the fuel filter didn't flow what I needed, and my pumps over flow it. found this on the dyno, and after researching it more, i found the specs on the filter/pumps. I'll be upgrading over winter to something more like what mike (blageo) has on his car. I posted this for the talk guys..see if it helps you:
http://www.dsmtalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=220716&page=2
C3L1CA
01-12-2010, 12:22 PM
How much power are you going to try and make and how much boost? Still have the 1600s?
If its nothing too much crazier than what kind of power you make now I'd just get a boost a pump and a pump of your choice. Since you're a 1g I'd put an 044 in tank, BAP on that, and replace the feed line like Brandon said. If you out flow the lines you can always upgrades those later. I'm just cheap and lazy and to me the intake with a boost a pump seems kinda cheap and mighty easy.
I'd be curious to see what you do and how it all works out.
Halon
01-12-2010, 12:22 PM
What's the goal of the car?
The 1G stock Fuel Return system (with the exception of the AFPR) is capable of supporting probably anything you plan on throwing at it. I would not touch that if I were you.
The feed system is basically 3/8 line, and is also capable of A LOT. The weak point in the feed system is the banjo fitting on top of the fuel filter, and the next weak point is the filter itself. At your levels right now, what I'd do (which is the actual setup on my car right now) is run the stock lines from the pump all the way to the filter. But put on a high flow filter, and then a nice new -6 feedline. That is what I've been running successfully.
And I also run intank 255hp's in parallel.
Swifty1638
01-12-2010, 12:25 PM
I didn't think you had enough fuel for the stock feed. hmm..nice! Either way, stock return is enough, my fuel system i HOPE is overkill for the future, since my plans are always changing.
mlomker
01-12-2010, 01:19 PM
Hmm. You guys run twins in parallel, even at idle? All of the Evo double-pump setups use a Hobbs switch based on boost or something more sophisticated to turn on the second pump. Perhaps it's just an Evo problem with the return...
asshanson
01-12-2010, 01:23 PM
That would be way better than running dual all the time. I've heard of people not being able to run < 50psi at idle with twin pumps. All the ones I've seen are on all the time.
Shane@DBPerformance
01-12-2010, 01:40 PM
C3L1CA, are you still on a stock fuel filter with the banjo setup replaced, or do you have an aftermarket filter?
C3L1CA
01-12-2010, 01:57 PM
Stock oem fuel filter with about 8k miles on it and have a -6 adapter so I'm running -6 from the filter to the line.
I wasn't going lean on the last dyno session was I once we figured out the crappy boost a pump dial?
Swifty1638
01-12-2010, 02:01 PM
If you want Brad, I have a pretty new russell performance -8 in/out fuel filter, that for your setup, won't be a restrictor. you can get adapters to turn the -8 to a -6 if you want it..let me know.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.