Log in

View Full Version : Dean Dropped Out!


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

LightningGSX
02-19-2004, 06:32 PM
The world is also very different now, as apposed to during the cold war.A war with russia was a bigger threat than russia itself was.Iraq didn't have to have missiles capable of delivering nukes, nuclear missiles are the least of our worries.

LightningGSX
02-19-2004, 06:37 PM
Originally posted by npaulseth@Feb 19 2004, 06:24 PM
The thing that you said was "could."  Nothing ever happened.  And as if we were going to invade every country and try and oust the terorists that stay there.  Please.  :rolleyes:
So you think we should just let people attack us before we do anything about it? Do you like seeing 911-type attacks?

npaulseth
02-19-2004, 06:42 PM
Of course I don't. But I'm not going to go around killing people based on half-ass info and ego trips. What is you plan for stopping world terorism? I'm done.

remy
02-19-2004, 06:44 PM
Nukes, Chemical, and Biological weapons were the least of our worries? What were we worried about, sand gernades?

And let people attack us? WTF are you talking about, Iraq wasn't going to invade us, and if you think that you must be trippin homie.

911 type attacks are going to be carried out by TERRORISTS which have nothiing to do with governments.

Oh and just so you know if it had been Gore that made all of these stupid decisions I would be against them then too.

LightningGSX
02-19-2004, 07:14 PM
1.I said nuclear missiles are the least of are problems, I didn't say chemical,biological or other nukes.
2.I said nothing about an invasion from Iraq.Thats just stupid
3.If terrorists have nothing to do with governments, why did you say Al Queida is linked to Saudi Arabia and Egypt in one of your previous posts.And in that case you must be against the Afghanistan invasion also? Al Queida linked Taliban wasn't the governing authority("government") in Afghanistan?

remy
02-19-2004, 07:24 PM
The previous post you are refering to said that the terrorists were FROM Saudi Arabia and Egypt. Let me make myself clear, I am sorry, what I should have said is that none terrorist governments have nothing to do with terrorists. As for Afghanistan they were a government that was being ruled by Al-Queda and the alusive Bin Laden. I do think that it is horrible that we have hundreds of people down in Guantanemo Bay with no rights, that are being totured. I though we were above that.

remy
02-19-2004, 07:25 PM
Originally posted by LightningGSX+Feb 19 2004, 06:37 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (LightningGSX @ Feb 19 2004, 06:37 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-npaulseth@Feb 19 2004, 06:24 PM
The thing that you said was "could."&nbsp; Nothing ever happened.&nbsp; And as if we were going to invade every country and try and oust the terorists that stay there.&nbsp; Please.&nbsp; :rolleyes:
So you think we should just let people attack us before we do anything about it? Do you like seeing 911-type attacks? [/b][/quote]
Sorry I assumed you were still refering to Iraq. :bowdown:
To think that Iraq was even close to capable of any sort of attack is ridiculous. Thats what I am saying.

LightningGSX
02-19-2004, 07:38 PM
How could Iraq(or any other group or country) NOT be capable of putting a few hijackers on a pre 911 US plane?

remy
02-19-2004, 07:53 PM
Hmmm, PRE,oh ohyeah that's right, it is now POST 9/11 so "Iraq(or any other group or country)" couldn't have pulled that crap either, still not example of them being a threat. Where do you come up with this stuff?

SlimStyleDSM
02-19-2004, 09:29 PM
:lol: Hehehe rem is pissed, this threads funny. Lightning :toast: to you buddy! haha