Log in

View Full Version : 519 AWHP- So far....

Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5
At-Least-It's-An-Evo
07-25-2007, 02:18 PM
Gotta love the 2.4 spool up. Is that with the 3065?

3575.

Congrats Steve. Now go trap 140. 11.9 at 140!
Matt D.
07-25-2007, 02:21 PM
Congrats, Steve! I think the last time I saw your car run was at Rock Falls when I tagged along with Carl a couple years ago.
scheides
07-25-2007, 02:29 PM
Woo Woo! I got to witness some tire burning action after bee's last night. I saw this sweet looking 1G get on 55E in front of me. Steve showed me his dyno graph and I have to say that the 2.4L with the 3575 or t67 would be a kick ass way to go. His torque curve is long and flat! Looking good steve!
turbotalon1g
07-25-2007, 02:33 PM
Congrats, how many miles on the 2.4?
Longevity of the 2.4 is the only thing that really worries me.
Can't wait to see what your final numbers/powercurve looks like.
TheBlizzard
07-25-2007, 02:37 PM
3575.

Congrats Steve. Now go trap 140. 11.9 at 140!

Yeah thats it, for some reason I thought he had the 3065. I was like wow thats a lot for that turbo.
JET
07-25-2007, 05:19 PM
Gratz Steve! Those are some nice numbers.
Shane@DBPerformance
07-25-2007, 05:21 PM
Yea, those are uncorrected DD AWD numbers, which are much much lower than Dynojet AWD numbers. From AWD cars that have dynoed here and on AWD Dynojets it takes about 18-20% to get to those numbers. So 519AWHP on ours might be around 612AWHP on a Dynojet AWD. To go from our dyno AWD to a DSM converted to FWD and run on a Dynojet is around 22% or so, or atleast thats the difference I saw with my wifes car.
Kevin 1G Drummer
07-25-2007, 05:34 PM
Wow. I can't wait to see this thing in person sometime!
1ViciousGSX
07-25-2007, 05:43 PM
Whoot, good to see it's running again. I'm glad to hear the 3575/T67 turbos do so well on 2.4L engines. I hope my T67/P-trim gets me my goal of 600 AWDWHP.

Great work Steve. Did you try doubling up T-band clamps on that hose? What timing were you able to get out of it?
1ViciousGSX
07-25-2007, 05:53 PM
Longevity of the 2.4 is the only thing that really worries me.
I have yet to see any real evidence that the 2.4L has longevity problems. Keep an honest rpm limit of 8500 and it should last as long as any 2.0L at 9000-10,000 rpm. I wind my 2.4L LR up to 8000-8500 and it just seems to love it. Marco (Magnus Motorsports) told me once about a guy that bought one of his long rod 2.4L engines spinning it up to 10,000+ rpm in Australia with no problems, but that might be where longevity could be an issue.