Log in

View Full Version : No replacement for displacement?


Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8

Goat Blower
06-08-2007, 01:24 PM
They're catching up. I've seen more and more articles about turbocharging and EFI in Hot Rod, and now they've even got a really cool cam-driven fuel pump that can provide enough fuel flow for a 1500 hp EFI engine without even putting a return line to the fuel tank. Talk about easy retrofit for the older V8 cars, bolts right in the stock location and is half the size of a stock pump.

Nice work on the Stang, I won't be lining up against many of those unless they're on cheap radials.

Speedfreak
06-08-2007, 04:52 PM
I know I asked this before, but what does his car rev to?

I need a V8.

turbotalon1g
06-08-2007, 05:03 PM
Yeah, I have been craving a twin turbo LS engine for a while now. Things like this make me realize that I won't get 1,000 awhp out of my car, because that is totally streetable anyway.

Hopefully next year :KANE: :sex2:

Shane@DBPerformance
06-08-2007, 07:34 PM
I know I asked this before, but what does his car rev to?

I need a V8.

7000 or so, we brought it out a lot farther than in the graph above on lower boost runs when it didn't misfire.

FattyBoomBatty
06-09-2007, 04:58 AM
That was pump 92? Like.

Shane@DBPerformance
06-09-2007, 12:03 PM
Yea, normal 92 octane pump gas. It was only 11psi. The motor was built low compression for turbo.

niterydr
06-09-2007, 03:37 PM
Nice numbers.

TheBlizzard
06-11-2007, 06:42 AM
Wow, impressive. 9 sec pump gas daily driver.

gofastman
06-11-2007, 12:39 PM
I think its time for a 408 and 2 turbos for the jeep!
Damn, I want money

sleepydsm
06-11-2007, 09:35 PM
Hmm, maybe I should turbo that GTO in my garage... Too bad it'd fall apart before I even turned the key.

Nice numbers!