MitsuStyle MitsuStyle

Go Back   MitsuStyle > The Homefront! > Project Talk

View Poll Results: How much WHP will I make on Cobb's AWD Mustang dyno?
<450 2 11.11%
450-475 3 16.67%
475-500 6 33.33%
500-525 3 16.67%
525-550 3 16.67%
>550 1 5.56%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-01-2013   #361
Kracka
R U DTF bro?
 
Kracka's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oak Point, TX
Drives: C8 Stingray Z51
Posts: 20,620
Re: SE take two! Err, make that three!

Quote:
Originally Posted by evotuner View Post
That makes my jeans tight
His previous 2.3L setup spooled the EF3 just like a stock IX turbo.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26 View Post
I agree with Kracka.
Kracka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2013   #362
Murlo26
 
Murlo26's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lino Lakes
Drives: 17 Honda Accord
Posts: 4,041
Re: SE take two! Err, make that three!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tachyon View Post
Indeed, still making 300 lbs of TQ at 8000 RPM is legitimate.
true that, solid setup for sure I think and safe, should last a LONG time.

I am hoping for double that at 9000 on the new setup
Murlo26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2013   #363
Tachyon
 
Tachyon's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Prior Lake
Drives: Icarus
Posts: 1,375
Re: SE take two! Err, make that three!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26 View Post

I am hoping for double that at 9000 on the new setup
You're shooting for over 1,000 HP?
__________________
"The moment money becomes your motivation, you're immediately not as good as someone who is stimulated by passion and internal will"
-Sebastian Vettel
Tachyon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2013   #364
Kracka
R U DTF bro?
 
Kracka's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oak Point, TX
Drives: C8 Stingray Z51
Posts: 20,620
Re: SE take two! Err, make that three!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26 View Post
true that, solid setup for sure I think and safe, should last a LONG time.

I am hoping for double that at 9000 on the new setup
4th engine here you come!!!

You are correct though, at these power levels Andrew's setup should last for a very long time!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26 View Post
I agree with Kracka.
Kracka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2013   #365
Murlo26
 
Murlo26's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lino Lakes
Drives: 17 Honda Accord
Posts: 4,041
Re: SE take two! Err, make that three!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tachyon View Post
You're shooting for over 1,000 HP?
No, I was just joking not yet I'm not anyway.
Murlo26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2013   #366
evotuner
 
evotuner's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mankato
Drives: 2004 Evo 8
Posts: 1,152
Re: SE take two! Err, make that three!

stock mivec cams still?
__________________
2010 Nissan GTR - E85 #RonnieTuned

2004 AS Evo VIII - MAP 2.3/FP Green E85 480/450 @30psi #RonnieTuned

2006 WW IX RS - Stock Motor/Turbo/E85 388/404 #RonnieTuned

2006 WW IX RS - 20K Miles - SOLD

2006 WW IX RS 396/404 - SOLD
evotuner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2013   #367
Kracka
R U DTF bro?
 
Kracka's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oak Point, TX
Drives: C8 Stingray Z51
Posts: 20,620
Re: SE take two! Err, make that three!

FP4Rv2 camshafts, stock unmodified gears.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26 View Post
I agree with Kracka.
Kracka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2013   #368
93gtpeater
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: stillwater
Drives: cbr 1000rr repsol
Posts: 1,451
Re: SE take two! Err, make that three!

I thought this thing would of broke 500hp on the dyno. But still very nice power on pump gas and stock bolt on turbo.
93gtpeater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013   #369
Kracka
R U DTF bro?
 
Kracka's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oak Point, TX
Drives: C8 Stingray Z51
Posts: 20,620
Re: SE take two! Err, make that three!

We'll see what it does come the 13th; I doubt it hits 500, but I can see it splitting the difference.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26 View Post
I agree with Kracka.
Kracka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2013   #370
PlanoEvo
DL OG
 
PlanoEvo's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Plano, TX
Drives: Evo IX SE
Posts: 224
Re: SE take two! Err, make that three!

One thing is for sure that if and when I ever decide to use higher octane fuel it will have no trouble at all going past 500.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by tehehodi View Post
Actually, i lied, hang around the drinking league if you want to party hard.
PlanoEvo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2015   #371
evotuner
 
evotuner's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mankato
Drives: 2004 Evo 8
Posts: 1,152
Re: SE take two! Err, make that three!

Whats the status of this bad bish?
__________________
2010 Nissan GTR - E85 #RonnieTuned

2004 AS Evo VIII - MAP 2.3/FP Green E85 480/450 @30psi #RonnieTuned

2006 WW IX RS - Stock Motor/Turbo/E85 388/404 #RonnieTuned

2006 WW IX RS - 20K Miles - SOLD

2006 WW IX RS 396/404 - SOLD
evotuner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2015   #372
Kracka
R U DTF bro?
 
Kracka's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oak Point, TX
Drives: C8 Stingray Z51
Posts: 20,620
Re: SE take two! Err, make that three!

Quote:
Originally Posted by evotuner View Post
Whats the status of this bad bish?
The car has been down and hasn't moved since April 2013. The new OEM Mitsu oil pump has a bad leak and Andrew lost motivation/drive to fix it. Otherwise, the car ran awesome and put down some serious power on pump gas. He was around 475 WHP @ Cobb when the fuel/fuel pump began to overheat requiring the tuning session to come to an end that day; the plan was to go back once he replaced the pump with something that runs cooler (like a DW300) and fixed what was a minor oil leak at the time...and then shortly after turned into a serious leak from the oil pump as mentioned above. He's since inherited his dad's C5 Corvette which has become his fun weekend toy. In the meantime, the Evo sits, and will likely continue to sit unfortunately. I'm slowly working on him though...I've offered to pay Cobb to fix it for him if he uses his AAA to get it towed there under the agreement he'd eventually pay me back
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26 View Post
I agree with Kracka.

Last edited by Kracka; 01-29-2015 at 07:56 AM..
Kracka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2015   #373
Alpha D
Got Boost o_O'' m
 
Alpha D's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: In a house
Drives: 1991 Eagle Talon TSI AWD Spooling Fiddy Trim Style
Posts: 1,389
Re: SE take two! Err, make that three!

e98 i guess is way better stuff obviously then e85 is what people say, but the price difference out the barrel is huge! at $1.70 for e85 right now you could get 55gallons at a bit under a hundred bux. So my question then map sells 55gallons for 340 roughly of e98 about 6 bux a GALLON...race gas is 7.50 last i checked...and now im not sure what the octane rating is for e98 i believe 105 or thats what i read on e98.com....110 at 7.50 is way more convenient i think then having a flamable drum in your garage...so what are the advantages to e98...this isnt a tech thread but figured it would be a quick response
Alpha D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2015   #374
Kracka
R U DTF bro?
 
Kracka's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oak Point, TX
Drives: C8 Stingray Z51
Posts: 20,620
Re: SE take two! Err, make that three!

E98 = a known, consistent product of 97.5-98.0% ethanol and 2.0-2.5% natural gasoline denaturant, no mystery sludge blend rates to make anywhere from E50 to E85...but generally in the E70-E80 range. E98 octane rating is going to be more like ~115, while E85 will be 105ish (but completely variable depending on the blend, and what was used for the blend).

If you can find an actual supplier or blender to barrel the straight E98 for you, it would be MUCH cheaper than what the race gas suppliers are selling it for; I'm talking well under $2/gal with the right connections.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26 View Post
I agree with Kracka.

Last edited by Kracka; 01-29-2015 at 10:39 AM..
Kracka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2015   #375
Murlo26
 
Murlo26's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lino Lakes
Drives: 17 Honda Accord
Posts: 4,041
Re: SE take two! Err, make that three!

Ethanol should not be compared on a straight octane rating either. Even "shitty" e85 from a pump still out performs most high octane fuels out there on high boosted applications like evos. The cooling properties to keep cylinder temps down are huge. Ethanol is awesome for anti detonation properties, so its not really comparable. Most shops will vote even crappy e85 all day long over most any race gas as its just better (assuming you don't get stuck with e50, but e70 is still great stuff) and its way more convenient to get as its at the gas station.
Murlo26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2015   #376
Kracka
R U DTF bro?
 
Kracka's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oak Point, TX
Drives: C8 Stingray Z51
Posts: 20,620
Re: SE take two! Err, make that three!

The biggest problem with pump E85 are it's inconsistencies, but a competent tuner should be able to build enough margin for error in to accommodate for it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26 View Post
I agree with Kracka.
Kracka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2015   #377
Murlo26
 
Murlo26's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lino Lakes
Drives: 17 Honda Accord
Posts: 4,041
Re: SE take two! Err, make that three!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kracka View Post
The biggest problem with pump E85 are it's inconsistencies, but a competent tuner should be able to build enough margin for error in to accommodate for it.
not to mention many applications can use flex fuel sensors now> i have my flex fuel setup awaiting tephra to finish the code/testing for it, can't wait

But yes, I agree on both parts. A tuner familiar with e85 shouldn't have issues with these inconsistencies as you tune to the lower denominator.
Murlo26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2015   #378
turbotalon1g
 
turbotalon1g's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Blaine, MN
Drives: '91 Automagic
Posts: 13,908
Send a message via AIM to turbotalon1g
Re: SE take two! Err, make that three!

Shawn is looking for a new car.......
__________________
Aaron/brownman/big brown.
'91 Automagic.
'02 Z06
Please leave feedback - http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/itrader.php?u=58309
turbotalon1g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2015   #379
Kracka
R U DTF bro?
 
Kracka's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oak Point, TX
Drives: C8 Stingray Z51
Posts: 20,620
Re: SE take two! Err, make that three!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26 View Post
not to mention many applications can use flex fuel sensors now> i have my flex fuel setup awaiting tephra to finish the code/testing for it, can't wait
Quite true, great advancements for sure! A real FlexFuel compatible tune would be amazing in an Evo. So with Tephra getting this implemented, I'd imagine you just get a tune on 93, and a tune on real E85, and the ECU automatically interpolates between the two maps as needed based on sensor readings?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlo26 View Post
I agree with Kracka.
Kracka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2015   #380
Murlo26
 
Murlo26's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lino Lakes
Drives: 17 Honda Accord
Posts: 4,041
Re: SE take two! Err, make that three!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kracka View Post
Quite true, great advancements for sure! A real FlexFuel compatible tune would be amazing in an Evo. So with Tephra getting this implemented, I'd imagine you just get a tune on 93, and a tune on real E85, and the ECU automatically interpolates between the two maps as needed based on sensor readings?
That is the idea I believe. But I don't know how much you can control for e levels. I would want anything above 70% to be basically balls out but below that be much much safer as I am just putting regular gas in for distance at that point not performance. I'd have ot ask how all that will work but that is the general concept.
Murlo26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
post liked by shane

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.