View Single Post
Old 08-23-2005   #9
tpunx99GSX
 
tpunx99GSX's Avatar
 
Tournaments Won: 3

Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Maple Grove, MN
Drives: Lancer and Durango
Posts: 7,017
Send a message via ICQ to tpunx99GSX Send a message via AIM to tpunx99GSX Send a message via MSN to tpunx99GSX Send a message via Yahoo to tpunx99GSX
Re: Those Picture Taking Things

I know you all may laugh at this but back when i worked at CompUSA (i think like 3 years ago) i did this sales contest where if you sold a certain amount of Kodak cameras you would get the camera that was in the tier of the amount you sold. well i sold 15 of them like 2 away from the top, and i received a 3.2 mp Kodak camera.
I wasnt sure what the quality was going to be like because kodak was pretty cheap when it came to digital cameras.
I took a crap load of pics with that camera and that camera fucking rocked. I compared it to my dads expensive ass olympus camedia camera and the kodak blew it out of the water with the quality of pics it was taking. I loved that camera so much.
But then after like 3 years of taking pictures it finally was dropped too many times and something broke inside of it and inside of my heart.
But anyways if your looking for a cheap camera that will do you right i would go with a kodak.
__________________
Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge. This is significantly different from the common usage of the word "theory", which implies that something is a conjecture, hypothesis, or guess.
tpunx99GSX is offline   Reply With Quote