Quote:
|
Originally posted by 92tsiawd84+Oct 27 2004, 08:53 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (92tsiawd84 @ Oct 27 2004, 08:53 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> Bush led us to war on the sole basis of WMDs.* I suposse they had something to do with 9/11 huh???* They were not a threat to the US no matter how Bush tries to convince everyone.[/b]
|
Actually that was only one of the reasons we went to war. And Iraq was linked to AlQuada.
Quote:
Originally posted by 92tsiawd84@Oct 27 2004, 08:53 AM
You are going to try and associate 9/11 with Iraq at fault?* You are retarted.* Ossama , the person behind 9/11, is still a free man.* We decide we wanted to just forget about that fucker and attack Iraq.* It has been proven that Iraq is not responsible at all for the actions of 9/11.
|
When Colin Powell adressed the UN before the war he listed the Depleted uranium intel (which is the same intel KERRY received when he voted FOR taking action against Iraq), But Powell also listed that Zarqawi, a known AlQuada terrorist was in Iraq. If thats not a link to AlQuada/Terrorists in Iraq I don't know what is. Now I admit it was a weak link but it is a link to AlQuada non the less. And it's funny but that seems to be the only thing (Zarqawi being there) that we were 100% right about. (So Far 
)
Do you remember what was playing over & over on Iraqi television on Sept 11th? It was a loop of the planes hitting the towers and the towers falling while "Down with America" & "Praise be to Allah" scrolled along the bottom. To say these guys were not a threat is crazy.
Quote:
Originally posted by 92tsiawd84@Oct 27 2004, 08:53 AM
We did not find any WMDs and therefore there is no proof that they have, had them when we went to war.
|
That is your speculation, not fact. Did you go snoop around Iraq previous to the war? The UN was deneid access to many areas they wanted to search. What was Saddam hiding? I guess having him sign another UN agreement which he has no intention of following would have been a better option? Then we could deal with it a 4TH TIME 5-10 years from now. The WMD's most likely disapeared while we were waiting for the crooked members of the UN(Germany/France/Russia) to vote on this issue.
<!--QuoteBegin-92tsiawd84@Oct 27 2004, 08:53 AM
Did you not read the newspaper or watch the fucking news the past several weeks. If you have, you should have known that the investigation was finally closed to say that Iraq had no WMDs.[/quote]
The ivestigation your reffering to says they
FOUND no WMD's, not that there were none. We will probably never know if there was or wasn't.
I'm just worried we will find out (they did have them and they made it out of Iraq) from forensic (sp?) scientists peicing together the peices/facts in the aftermath of a major terrorist attack in the US or abroad.