Quote:
Originally posted by remy+Oct 11 2004, 08:43 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (remy @ Oct 11 2004, 08:43 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-LightningGSX@Oct 9 2004, 09:03 PM
By the way,* NOTHING regarding Iraq and WMDs or links to terrorism has been either proven or disproven, once again, I don't know where you get this info.Michael Moore?
|
Actually the 9/11 commision proved that Iraq had no links to Suddam, and just the other day it came out that Iraq had NO wmd's. Wrong again. [/b][/quote]
I assume once again you are reading some liberals interpretation of the report, but if you read parts of the actual report, it states there WERE links between Iraq and Al Quaeda, just not a collaboration between Iraq and Al Quaeda on the 9/11 event.Besides that, it is known a high ranking member of Saddams fedayeen(sp?), Ahmed Hikmat Shakir, was also a high ranking member of Al Quaeda.So I'll sum it up for you,according to the 9/11 commission, there WERE definate links between Saddam and Al Quaeda, but Iraq was not behind 9/11.And no one ever said Saddam was behind 9/11, so you're talking out your impressionable ignorant ass again.
And I can't seem to find the part that states there were no WMDs in Iraq or any other proof there were no WMDs in Iraq, maybe you could point that out?