MitsuStyle - View Single Post

Andrew7dg · 04-06-2010

there is argument for all of the combos

2.0 has better rod to stroke ratio (don't mess with mitsubishi engineering!!!! plus the argument SHEP RUNS IT!!!)
2.3 is better because it has light pistons and more torque shouldn't go over 7000 (shouldn't but people have)
2.4 is better because it could be stronger then the 2.3 and has more torque but only revs till max 8000 (the argument is that MAP RUNS IT!!!)
2.1... ummm.... potential 10,000rpm?..

so all of them have an argument on which one is better

It all comes down to personal preference and what you are going to use the car for

04-06-2010	#6
Andrew7dg Built it from scratch! Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: St. Paul Drives: Currently Mitsu-less Posts: 851	Re: Stroker there is argument for all of the combos 2.0 has better rod to stroke ratio (don't mess with mitsubishi engineering!!!! plus the argument SHEP RUNS IT!!!) 2.3 is better because it has light pistons and more torque shouldn't go over 7000 (shouldn't but people have) 2.4 is better because it could be stronger then the 2.3 and has more torque but only revs till max 8000 (the argument is that MAP RUNS IT!!!) 2.1... ummm.... potential 10,000rpm?.. so all of them have an argument on which one is better It all comes down to personal preference and what you are going to use the car for __________________ "A turbo, exhaust gasses go into the turbocharger and spin it, witchcraft happens and you go faster."