View Single Post
Old 06-27-2009   #19
Halon
Pewp Champion
 
Halon's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Blaine
Drives: Teh Bean
Posts: 12,309
Send a message via AIM to Halon
Re: Considering stroker, looking for feedback

As was mentioned, whether the 100mm crank is used in a 63 or 64 block, the rod ratio should be the same.

2.38 is 2.4 just like our 1.99's are 2.0's.

Anyhow, here is a nice little chart to use as a reference in regards to displacement. The pistons I'll more than likely be getting are 40 over (86.5mm) which when combined with the 100mm crank, show that I'm sitting closer to 2.35 (which does round to 2.4). So switching to a 4G64 block really won't net me .1L more. I can get that same 2.4 if I just bore it out further. The 4G64 is a 2.4 because it simply has a larger bore...



Again, I've done the research on the motor itself. What my question was, is this a good idea considering the rest of my setup. Just want to make sure that with the added displancement and airflow I'll be seeing, will I actually lose power or anything because I'm choking it. Maybe my setup works great on a 2.0, but add that extra bit of displacement, just want to make sure I'm going to kill my setup.

Thanks for all the feedback so far though, keep it coming! Right now I'm just trying to locate some pistons.
__________________
B-Man - FlexFuel Mafia
1991 TSi AWD E85 - BEP S362, DSMLink V2, Built 2.0L Idle Vid 628hp Graph 541hp Vid 10.93@137 Vid
1992 SC300 E85 - BW 84-75, Vlad Infinity, NA-T, 6spd Idle Vid 709hp Graph 709hp Vid 11.1@131 Vid
2006 Bayliner 195 - Carbed 5.0 Top Speed Test
Halon is offline   Reply With Quote