View Single Post
Old 06-23-2009   #3
Halon
Pewp Champion
 
Halon's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Blaine
Drives: Teh Bean
Posts: 12,309
Send a message via AIM to Halon
Re: Considering stroker, looking for feedback

Yes it does use standard rods. The piston pin is raised on the piston itself. So standard rods, with a special piston.

I don't want to use the 2.4 block. I want to keep the 4g63 block for my own reasons.

Your extra .1 comes from a larger bore, which I could just do to my block if I really wanted that extra .1 (I believe I'd need around a 60 overbore to be at 2.4) so I'll already be close at a 40 overbore.

Anyhow, I've already got all that research out of the way, and am fine with all that.

What I'm really conserned about, and wanting feedback on, is if going 2.3 is going to actually hurt me because maybe my supporting mods aren't going to flow enough, and actually going to choke the stroker setup. I do not want to change anything else. So I'll still be on a 1Gnt TB, 2.5" IC piping, and 272 cams. Maybe not ideal for a stroker, but will I still be right at the same power level, or will I actually lose power because these simply can't support the extra displacement and will juust be choking it?
__________________
B-Man - FlexFuel Mafia
1991 TSi AWD E85 - BEP S362, DSMLink V2, Built 2.0L Idle Vid 628hp Graph 541hp Vid 10.93@137 Vid
1992 SC300 E85 - BW 84-75, Vlad Infinity, NA-T, 6spd Idle Vid 709hp Graph 709hp Vid 11.1@131 Vid
2006 Bayliner 195 - Carbed 5.0 Top Speed Test
Halon is offline   Reply With Quote