Quote:
Originally posted by tsiawdspeed@Feb 19 2004, 05:20 PM
I honestly dont see why everyone is blaming Bush for "lying" about the WMD's. He is not the one who goes out ther and does the recon. His advisors said that there were WMD's and he believed them, which is a normal thing to do. He made his decision based on the information he was given by his advisors. If anyone should be blamed for going into Iraq, it should be his military advisors because they were the ones who told him that the WMD's existed. Also, who really cares if there are no WMD's? We got Saddam and that should be a good enough reason to justify the war. This whole subject really makes me mad because the majority of people believe that Bush is doing a bad job. He is doing a exceptional job, given the circumstances. I'm pretty sure that any other president would have made the same choice about Iraq.
Republicans>Democrats
|
We are or I am blaming Bush because he is the fucking President, Commander in Cheif, and foremost the person that sold the war to you impressionable lap dogs. Of course he's not going to come out saying "yeah everyone I was wrong" hell no he is going to do what he did, blame the CIA. And your sure any other president would have done the same thing huh? What in the hell makes you think that? Days after 9/11 Bush had Iraq in his cross-hairs. A sencible president would have gone after terrorists, not countries with which he and his father had standing disagreement with. And how is "the world" safer now that Saddam has been captured? Seems to me that as americans we have pissed off an already angry region, and the backlash will be felt for years to come.
and shouldn't democrates and republicans work together to make America a better place, instead of always fighting and getting nothing done?