View Single Post
Old 02-12-2004   #14
JET
Is funding Exxon.
 
JET's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ham Lake
Drives: like a bat outta hell!
Posts: 7,983
Send a message via AIM to JET Send a message via Yahoo to JET
Quote:
Originally posted by Raptor@Feb 12 2004, 10:06 PM
Actually, this isn't something that is just me guessing, it is proven theory. Decreasing diameter does reduce bearing surface speed. Consider it like this, in the same revolution, a larger bearing journal is going to have a larger circumfrence to cover which means higher speed on the bearing surface causing more friction at higher RPM.

As far as squeezing oil out, there would be no issues if the correct oil viscosity, preasure and bearing clearances are used.
I agree with the speed being lower, that is simple physics. I just don't think it outweighs the smaller contact patch. I too agree that it would be negligable with this small change.

The nitride thickness on a DSM is supposed to be .012", so turning one .010" is asking for trouble if you ask me.
__________________
Is burning corn and stayin' warm!

My motorcycle is stock and reliable, my Talon is neither!
JET is offline   Reply With Quote