MitsuStyle - View Single Post

Kougar · 07-28-2006

Why does Reid need to be the one to pounce? Meh.

Yea, stock heads are flowing nightmares compared to a 4g63 head. Even with everything you can do to the head, it's flow still won't be all that impressive. Who cares though. People who buy a conquest (and stay g54b) are looking for torque, and that's exactly what it dishes out. MPI + big turbo have yielded awesome results already. 500hp+ is a reality, even with the flow rates of the head.

Alan - Honestly, I think it's cheaper and easier to get 300hp (and gobs more torque than a 4g63) out of the stock engine, then it is to swap a 4g63 in it.

And as for the F-body comment: What would be easier to work on? LS1 in a conquest, or LS1 in the F-body. Hmmm...

07-28-2006	#14
Kougar Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Eagan Drives: 06 RSX Posts: 503	Re: 4G63 in a Conquest/Starion Why does Reid need to be the one to pounce? Meh. Yea, stock heads are flowing nightmares compared to a 4g63 head. Even with everything you can do to the head, it's flow still won't be all that impressive. Who cares though. People who buy a conquest (and stay g54b) are looking for torque, and that's exactly what it dishes out. MPI + big turbo have yielded awesome results already. 500hp+ is a reality, even with the flow rates of the head. Alan - Honestly, I think it's cheaper and easier to get 300hp (and gobs more torque than a 4g63) out of the stock engine, then it is to swap a 4g63 in it. And as for the F-body comment: What would be easier to work on? LS1 in a conquest, or LS1 in the F-body. Hmmm...