View Single Post
Old 10-12-2005   #17
tpunx99GSX
 
tpunx99GSX's Avatar
 
Tournaments Won: 3

Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Maple Grove, MN
Drives: Lancer and Durango
Posts: 7,017
Send a message via ICQ to tpunx99GSX Send a message via AIM to tpunx99GSX Send a message via MSN to tpunx99GSX Send a message via Yahoo to tpunx99GSX
Re: Got my appointment...

Quote:
Originally Posted by ecoli
The stock 450s might have been good enough.

Around -30% will work fine for the low throttle and idle, but in the high throttle settings you usually have to go a lot farther negative. If it doesn't flow much air, though then you might be fine. On a bigger turbo with 660-680s on a 2G you often enough up being in the -42% to -50% range on the AFC. The main drawback to going so far negative on the AFC is that it puts the ECU into the wrong airflow maps and often trys to run too much timing, which results in knock. 2Gs don't run nearly as much timing as a 1G, so that might help a little, and without a DSMLink to see if it's knocking or not you won't know how much it is retarding timing, so you can instead just pretend it's fine. It should run fine though, I hope you have a FMIC for that much boost.
Thanks for the info. So your saying if i got the 680s it would in effect be fine, just a lot of negatives. But if i got the 550s that would put me less negative correct?
I have a FMIC, its just not installed or piped up on the car yet, would that work. LOL Ive run 16-20 on a daily for the past 8 months without hitting any fuel cut, but we will see i guess. LOL
The shop im going to said that Cams might help out as well, but i dunno...
__________________
Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge. This is significantly different from the common usage of the word "theory", which implies that something is a conjecture, hypothesis, or guess.
tpunx99GSX is offline   Reply With Quote