[sleepy2lazy]

i know he shot them in the back.
But as to why is the reason.

There's more reason as to why he shot them in the back.

"I remember reading something similar to this in history. The man was looked upon guilty to the core. It appeared that he nailed another man with a hammer. But in the end, it turned out that it wasn't him. It was due to the guy falling down and hitting himself. The accused was asian, the dead man was white. The jury and the people around were white."

I'm not defending him to death here guys. I'm just saying there is something there.
Because of ties, its just odd he would do something like that unless something else occurred. According to reading the paper, one testimony said Chai Vang apologized and was leaving. (I just think its odd how he would apologize, eave then turn around and shoot)

This case has its facts. It has its evidence. And it has mystery.


But b/c of ties, i feel something else unspoken is there. This is why there is those "what ifs"
thats just my opinion.

Now if it was someone like that BTK fucker, i'd want justice to the core.